Were new rules meant to turn WRC into an aero formula? Doesn’t sound very cost effective to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
Printable View
Were new rules meant to turn WRC into an aero formula? Doesn’t sound very cost effective to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...41b8c3e146.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Rallyest
Katsuta https://youtu.be/OcbMIj2Ub10
Towards the end the car was competitive in Tänak and Neuvilles hands, when they were winning rallys they didn't complain to much. Clearly the development work payed off.Quote:
Originally Posted by EstWRC
still way more simple aero than previous spec...Quote:
Originally Posted by RS
It’s not so much the extent of it but the fact they come with 16 different designs of wing mirror in one year (I exaggerate for effect, but still..)Quote:
Originally Posted by wyler
Lappi Day2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x-3vEKiw5k
yes, but still they have way fewer things to play with than the previous spec. don't think 16 wing mirror is more expensive than 16 combinations of winglets on a front bumper...Quote:
Originally Posted by RS
anyway, it's the same as forever. who has money will find the way to spend it, even on a rally5.