Sutil will stand trial in a German court later this month

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

My goodness I've rarely seen such supposition and conjecture outside of the Daily Mail website :s

---

You never read the Sunday Sport then?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

My goodness I've rarely seen such supposition and conjecture outside of the Daily Mail website :s

---

Would you like to contribute to the debate , Dave ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

Would you like to contribute to the debate , Dave ?

---

Open the pod bay doors........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

You never read the Sunday Sport then?

---

Would you like to contribute to it , too ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Black Knight

I'm aware of the inherent contradiction but I'm actually a big Schumacher fan. I'm not bashing him, I'm trying to point out ioan's bias to him and open his eyes a little so he can see that plenty of drivers, including Schuey, have used the "I didn't see him" excuse and sometimes it is just that, they didn't see.

---

Ioan always likes to play the devil's advocate, to put it mildly. ;) BTW I remember that in 2004, after the San Marino GP, Montoya was very angry at Michael for his "I didn't see him" answer at the press conference after the race and accused him of being "blind or stupid". :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by F1boat

and accused him of being "blind or stupid". :D

---

I'm over here, Michael........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

Would you like to contribute to it , too ?

---

Is there a suggested donation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Is there a suggested donation?

---

Try supplying a well-reasoned explanation as to why the Sutils are so upset .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

Try supplying a well-reasoned explanation as to why the Sutils are so upset .

---

Errrrr, cos he got a suspended sentence and is looking for someone, anyone, to have a pop at - it's everyone elses fault but his........

Hamilton is a coward, apparently, for not appearing even though the court did not request his presence.

Mmmmm, ya, that makes sense, init tho?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

Would you like to contribute to the debate , Dave ?

---

Not particularly because (like you) I don't know the full facts. Anything I could add would only be my own opinion and conjecture and bring nothing to the debate.