I thought that 'equivalency formula' was when you get two cars that are built to different regulations competing? Like with the BTC versus Super2000 versus NGTC ?
Printable View
I thought that 'equivalency formula' was when you get two cars that are built to different regulations competing? Like with the BTC versus Super2000 versus NGTC ?
And what do you think is the effect of imposing a certain engine formula, limiting the revs to 18000 / min and then freezing it?! :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyL
That's not an equivalency formula, for the reasons given by others above — as stated, an equivalency formula is when efforts are made to even out the performance of, say, turbo or non-turbo cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo
I'd more say it's a formula intended to limit maximum performance. Based on "equivalency" you would think there are spec cars on the track, and that the Virgin should be just as fast as the Red Bull.
And in the current Formula, they have DRS and KERS. Like it or not it's here for now.
well carving through all the bullish!t posts here - I kinda like the system so far.
Hear, hearQuote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Today's motorsport is about parity, cost cutting and the 'show'.
This flappy wing was and still is a joke. I noticed that the DRS activation zones have been put in place for the Chinese Grand Prix. I wonder what will be the DRS activation zones will be at Monaco. Laughable!
This is what Alonso said after Malaysia: "If the system (DRS) had worked, I could comfortably have got past Hamilton on the pit straight and I would not have found myself having to fight him wheel to wheel and taking risks."
But isn't that what we want? Would be interesting to see how this years new tyres would have affected "natural" racing without DRS.
Do the drivers still have a front wing adjust?
No Jon, that's gone