This is one of the reasons why I think the initial high court ruling was so effective. Whilst it found the journalist guilty, sending the message to the press that such future behaviour shouldn't be tolerated, the penalty to the journalist involved was quite small so as to ensure that worried editors wouldn't be scared off investigating genuinely interesting stories.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Revisiting that ruling, which Mosley seems happy to do, wouldn't achieve much more IMO