According to some recent news reports, Ferrari's suffered a valve failure of some kind during the race. At least that might the official version given to press.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstillhere
Printable View
According to some recent news reports, Ferrari's suffered a valve failure of some kind during the race. At least that might the official version given to press.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstillhere
Seems about 10 to six months or so ago, everyone was saying the same thing about a certain set of copy shop doucments and rumors of a certian enginneer with white powder on his pants....and then emails and such...all of which turned out to be:Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
A. unfounded rumour
B. Specualtion
C. All of the bove
D. none of the above
Link please. I have been unsuccessfully looking for xtra info with no results.Quote:
Originally Posted by janneppi
There you go. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by mstillhere
http://www.turunsanomat.fi/f1/?ts=1,...4,1:0:0:0:0:0:
There are pobably some rumors flying around. They may be right. This is the latest official word:Quote:
Originally Posted by mstillhere
Engineers already have a hypothesis as to the cause and this should be confirmed once they are inspected. New engines are currently on their way from Italy to Malaysia and these will arrive on Friday, in order to be fitted for the competitive part of the weekend. As neither car finished the Australian GP, the engine change is penalty-free. Of course, current regulations require a freeze on the actual construction of the power units, but as this is not felt to be the cause of their failure in the first race and as the problem is not believed to be heat related,
Me too. But some people still believe that McLaren and RD are purer than a virgin.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
As far as I know only Bridgestone and Michelin took part in the tender.Quote:
Originally Posted by jjanicke
With Michelin proving in 2005 that they couldn't build a capable tire for every circumstances, the obvious choice was Bridgestone.
Well then your knowledge is incorrect.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
I loved reading it. Except for the last two lines, where I was not too sure about a regionalism, everything else made a lot of sense. Thank you. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by janneppi
Than correct it! Who else was involved?Quote:
Originally Posted by jjanicke