Well, it's two weeks now and the numbers are even lower. Can we now make a conclusion that people gathering didn't cause any COVID outbreak and that the decision to unofficially allow spectators was a good one by the organizers? I believe we can.
Printable View
And what was your concluison a week ago? "Let's wait for a week to have a conclusion." And now suddenly it's not possible to make them.
Great. Spectating the event hasn't caused any uprise in COVID spreading. Fact. ATM it's possible to organize a rally with spectators. Fact. Enough form and anyone who thinks with its own head.
ehm. A conclusion is something that ends something, so to say "let's wait" is the opposite of a conclusion...
we ll have a conclusion when the pandemic ends. there's plenty of situations like this and plenty opposite. I.e, in India a big religious gathering had a really bad outcome. This applies everywhere? No either. Take one thing out of context is risky, and the context is a global pandemic. There are loads of factors that affect covid spread. Nothing can assure you that a thing that happened in Croatia or India would work the same in Sardinia or Estonia or Kenia or everywhere.
Again: I'm happy everything went well, I hope everything will go well in the other places. Still, I cant state this model will be generally good, so I ll not claim what I say as the truth.
Again: you can claim what pleases you most.
Well, I was talking only about spectators on Rally Croatia and its Covid consequences, lack of them, to be precise. That's a fact. And I see no reason why would other events be any different. Maybe they wily maybe they won't. But Croatia's example says it is possible to do it.
https://youtu.be/UeR-PNi8seU was it circuit racing or rally in Croatia? :)