Rallye Wrc Monte-Carlo 2013

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PLuto

Also drivers didnt received good times into their timecards at the finish. But "actually final version" of correct times looks like this: Rallye Monte Carlo 2013 - Results - Rally-Base

---

these seems right.

ES3- Loeb creuse l'écart (MC 2013)

What does "

Ogier, Hirvonen, Sordo, Latvala et Ostberg avec 2 min de trop"

mean? Google didnt help

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Simmi

So you're saying Ogier was actually fastest? I don't think he was.

---

Why not? makes a whole lot more sense than Neuville or Ostberg.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brother John

And how about this then? stage times
World Rally Championship - Results - Rallye Monte-Carlo

---

This is for sure wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dimviii

these seems right.

---

I agree!!! That seems very logical from the splits...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Simmi

So you're saying Ogier was actually fastest? I don't think he was.

---

why wasn t faster at 4th split by 4 sec?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by uranium

ES3- Loeb creuse l'écart (MC 2013)

What does "

Ogier, Hirvonen, Sordo, Latvala et Ostberg avec 2 min de trop"

mean? Google didnt help

---

Those have 2 min too much

Think Citroen's times should be viewed with a large does of scepticism.

Everyone is complaining to @FIA on twitter. Drivers, teams and co drivers + fans are having a go on Twitter.

How can TEAMS and DRIVERS NOT HAVE SPLIT TIMES?!?!? It's ALL over the place!

Citroen are waiting for SS3 stage times and SS4 is about to start!

Almost all the times in every site are wrong. Conditions were better tha during the first pass.. they had faster tires.. They cannot be slower than during the first pass. time with 25:xx looks correct. Last year times were 24:01
27:xx cannot be correct