Briatore's ban overturned in French court

10.1. The WMSC notes that in advance of the hearing there had been statements in the press indicating that Renault had possession of very large numbers of McLaren drawings. McLaren has acknowledged to the WMSC that it circulated an erroneous press briefing which had created this impression, and has apologised and issued a correction.

http://www.f1technical.net/news/7784

Furthermore, Mackereth did not have full plans of the 2006 Mclaren, and no plans of the 2008 car as you have falsely claimed.

"4.3. Although volume is no indicator of value, to offer a sense of perspective, of the 762 pages of information taken by Mackereth, 111 pages contained McLaren information and were transferred to Renault’s systems or premises (about 15%) and were therefore theoretically under Renault’s control."

and

"5.12. The investigations revealed that Mackereth took a relatively significant volume of information from McLaren.However, the evidence supports the conclusion that only four items were ever shown to or made known to persons at Renault. McLaren made submissions that other documents might have been discussed, disseminated or used but after its own extensive investigations can offer no evidence to this effect. Nor has the FIA’s own investigation indicated any such evidence"

http://www.f1technical.net/news/7784

you see, you should really check facts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamburello

10.1. The WMSC notes that in advance of the hearing there had been statements in the press indicating that Renault had possession of very large numbers of McLaren drawings. McLaren has acknowledged to the WMSC that it circulated an erroneous press briefing which had created this impression, and has apologised and issued a correction.

http://www.f1technical.net/news/7784

Furthermore, Mackereth did not have full plans of the 2006 Mclaren, and no plans of the 2008 car as you have falsely claimed.

"4.3. Although volume is no indicator of value, to offer a sense of perspective, of the 762 pages of information taken by Mackereth, 111 pages contained McLaren information and were transferred to Renault’s systems or premises (about 15%) and were therefore theoretically under Renault’s control."

and

"5.12. The investigations revealed that Mackereth took a relatively significant volume of information from McLaren.However, the evidence supports the conclusion that only four items were ever shown to or made known to persons at Renault. McLaren made submissions that other documents might have been discussed, disseminated or used but after its own extensive investigations can offer no evidence to this effect. Nor has the FIA’s own investigation indicated any such evidence"

http://www.f1technical.net/news/7784

you see, you should really check facts.

---

And Neil Armstrong didn't land on the moon - just out in the desert somewhere. Never prove it of course, but it looked real enough......
And, of course, the WMSC, and indeed the FIA have recently been shown to be not particularly 'on the correct side of the law' when it comes to legal matters.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

And Neil Armstrong didn't land on the moon - just out in the desert somewhere. Never prove it of course, but it looked real enough......
And, of course, the WMSC, and indeed the FIA have recently been shown to be not particularly 'on the correct side of the law' when it comes to legal matters.....

---

So no facts to refute those I stated, just the normal pro-Mclaren hogwash diversion tactic.

Mclaren - Guilty far beyond Renault? - Proven by facts.

Renault - Guilty equally with Mclaren? - Utter supposition with no proven facts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

And Neil Armstrong didn't land on the moon - just out in the desert somewhere. Never prove it of course, but it looked real enough......
And, of course, the WMSC, and indeed the FIA have recently been shown to be not particularly 'on the correct side of the law' when it comes to legal matters.....

---

The FiA/WMSC have behaved like a Kangaroo court, as is per usual......