NASCAR may have to answer for the lack of a banned substance list. NASCAR is putting up a good front, but this is no slam dunk.
Printable View
NASCAR may have to answer for the lack of a banned substance list. NASCAR is putting up a good front, but this is no slam dunk.
Maybe so but Jeremy's days in NASCAR racing are over.
I don't think so. If mayfield wins the case there's likely to be some anti-retalition clauses in the judgement, and even Nascar isn't so arrogant as to defy a federal court order.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky1329
Jeremy apparently has been taking meth according to ESPN. Interesting.....and it makes sense when Dave Moody on Sirius Speedway interviewed the ESPN reporter who broke the story. Dave said that a drug expert told him that if Jeremy was taking Adderol, it would be likely to mask the use of Meth. Dave didn't report THAT to us listeners until this ESPN story broke.
Jeremy is done for. All you guys questioning the NASCAR drug policy and how it is implemented are watching the distraction while ignoring the fact one of the top league of NASCAR drivers was competing while under the influence of Meth, a drug that gives you a huge high, gives you a superhero complex and radically messes with your judgement. Not things I want in a guy beside me on the banking at Talladega...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
You know how it goes Mark, if Jeremy were to have had a bad wreck and it was found out in the care center that he was taking meth, these same people questioning NASCAR's drug policy would be screaming that NASCAR wasn't doing enough to make sure that drivers were not driving under the influence.
That fact that meth "gives you a huge high, gives you a superhero complex and radically messes with your judgement" explains a lot. It sounds like an apt characterization of Jeremy's behavior.
Mayfield's career isn't exactly over if he wins. If he wins he still has his own team, and canstill race. No other team is likely to hire him, although that theory has been proved wrong before.