FIA slams Hill and explains what and why they do

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

The point I made was that you were wrong to dismiss the potential effect of the floor (legal or not) issue.

---

So what exactly are the "potential effects?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wmcot

So what exactly are the "potential effects?"

---

Well, what do think they might be?

Errr, ummm, if Ferrari HAD (potentially) been disqualified for the floor, thats 10 points Kimi's lost already.

Did he win the WDC by 10 points?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Well, what do think they might be?

Errr, ummm, if Ferrari HAD (potentially) been disqualified for the floor, thats 10 points Kimi's lost already.

Did he win the WDC by 10 points?

---

But McLaren's floor had to be changed too!
And they run an illegally fitted light gearbox in Hungary!

So, who would have won it in the end? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ioan

But McLaren's floor had to be changed too!
And they run an illegally fitted light gearbox in Hungary!

So, who would have won it in the end? ;)

---

Look, I appreciate that, but I was referring to specific comment, on a specific subject, and what affect that might have on the championship.

If the comment had included the McLaren, that that would be relevant, but it didn't, it wasn't and so I didn't refer to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Look, I appreciate that, but I was referring to specific comment, on a specific subject, and what affect that might have on the championship.

If the comment had included the McLaren, that that would be relevant, but it didn't, it wasn't and so I didn't refer to it.

---

The championship is over a whole season and it should be seen as a whole.

While I appreciate your try to comment specific subjects, and how that would appreciate the final outcome, I think that it is not correct to overlook all the other factors involved in the matter.
It is completely irrelevant to talk about one fact that would have an influence on the final outcome while discarding all the other factors.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Well, what do think they might be?

Errr, ummm, if Ferrari HAD (potentially) been disqualified for the floor, thats 10 points Kimi's lost already.

Did he win the WDC by 10 points?

---

As Ioan pointed out, McLaren were running a similar floor. If Ferrari had been disqualified, I assume McLaren (and Red Bull) would have been, also. The results would be the same.

The point is that if Lewis had managed 2 additional points from China or Brazil, nobody would care about the floors at Melbourne!

The floors were perfectly legal in Melbourne. Kimi is champion. End of story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by F1boat

The floors were perfectly legal in Melbourne. Kimi is champion. End of story.

---

Charlie Whiting said the floor was clearly illegal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by passmeatissue

Charlie Whiting said the floor was clearly illegal.

---

Why don't you just appeal to the FIA COA and give us all a break with your broken record?
You could show them all the "evidence" you have about those "illegal" floors! :s :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by passmeatissue

Charlie Whiting said the floor was clearly illegal.

---

Why don't you just appeal to the FIA COA ( I bet Ron would support your idea) and give us all a break with your broken record?
You could show them all the "evidence" you have about those "illegal" floors! :s :rolleyes: