Both Liuzzi and Maylander were very lucky that Maylander somehow saw him coming and got out the way just in time :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
Printable View
Both Liuzzi and Maylander were very lucky that Maylander somehow saw him coming and got out the way just in time :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
The SC entered the track on lap 3; but it wasn't until Winkelhock passed lap 4 when he came behind (and the rest of the cars too).Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
But the point was if the crane entered the gravel trap before the SC signal appeared, and it's clear on this video, it entered prior to the SC signal, just a couple of seconds after Button crashed, and just when Hamilton was stopping his run, as it can be seen on this video (at 5 minutes, 0 seconds):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcMqdIPzf9A
An even better question is how he could leave the pit, if according to the rules, pit lane is closed as the SC is deployed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
3:40 "Winkelhock in the rain, a sensational tenth ! " :rotflmao:
ORF commenting is crap, I'm glad I don't have them on my watch list :D
Safety car was barely moving at 6:00 in that video and began moving after a car had accelerated from the edge of turn 1, whose car was that?Quote:
Originally Posted by andreag
Hamilton's?
You tell me?!Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Hans Prüller has troubles to make a difference between an overtaken car and the overtaker.
I miss the times when I was watching F1 on the Italian television, it was far better than what I get now.
No, Liuzzi. Who incredibly was leaving the pit lane when the SC was on the track (not only the SC signal), and it's supposedly close. Of course he couldn't continue (the crane didn't help him), and the 10 seconds penalty coudn't be applied, but no sign of this appearedQuote:
Originally Posted by janneppi
There are some issues that we need to watch in this situation,
The only reason for Hamilton to keep his engine running it was:
-Not damaging the car by going to the gravel
-Very early stage in the race, lap 4 or so, with the new safety car rule of unlapping himself and with the rocket that Macca is, he could even fight for points.
-So, for him it was worthy to keep racing.
but the fundamental thing here it is, if the Safety car rules were still the same
as last year's rules, and Hamilton was still helped to keep on racing by the crane, could McLaren could stop racing without a mechanical failure with the only motive of "not having a real reason to fight in this race", can a team do that, stop because they have nothing to fight for in a race anymore, or is it illegal??
I remember Honda did it in Australia 2005, both Honda cars were out of the points and they called them to the pits to retire motivated by the recent engine rule changes of one engine for two weekends recently applied back in 2005.
I'm getting messy, did anybody understand me?
Cheers!
I don't mean liuzzi, who flew into the crane :)Quote:
Originally Posted by andreag
But the car that accelerated from corner 1 just as SC was entering it.
at 6:01 we see SC slowing to an almost halt, at 6:06 we see two F1 cars and the SC, Liuzzi is flying from right to left and one F1 car is accelerating from the corner.
Is that Hamilton or possibly one of the Williamses?
I see; it was Davidson, who nearly reached the gravel when he spun off, stopping just in the border; he could restart unaided, and he was just leaving the dangerous line when the SC has to accelerate to avoid Liuzzi's hit from behind.Quote:
Originally Posted by janneppi