What justification can there ever be for uploading your last team's blueprints onto your new teams computers.
Printable View
What justification can there ever be for uploading your last team's blueprints onto your new teams computers.
The same as with using another teams blueprints and other documentation.Quote:
Originally Posted by motetarip
Not as I understand it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
All the WMSC could prove is that 4 aspects of the McLaren design were shared at Renault amongst the engineers, and that none of those aspects were integrated into the Renault car. There was plenty more information stored on Mackereth's Renault computer but none that could be proven to have been disseminated within the team. Because people aren't allowed to look over other peoples shoulder's at work..
Please read and digest: http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre...c_071207a.aspx
I think you might have agreed with me there :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
I'm not saying McLaren weren't guilty, I do think Renault should have been punished though.
I have never liked the prick but all this proves what most of us think: that there is no justice in the way FIA enforces its rules. Penalties are based on personal grudges most of the time.
Yeah! but Max had the whip hand, didn't he!!Quote:
Originally Posted by eu
The title of this thread should be changed to 'Rehash, yet again, what happened 2 years ago.'
It would be nice to get back to something resembling current events.
it was the right thing to ban him for life IMHO they just didnt do the right thing regarding the process......Quote:
Originally Posted by eu
now FIA rules are made irrelevent as now if you get a penalty you can run to the courts and get it overtuned
They should appeal for that reason alone and release in full everything that was done in the trial to prove transperency (from revealing mr x and everything else that happend)
But has he - legally maybe BUT he is damaged goods and wont be considerd by any sane motorsport team and after this Flavio and Symodns is free to be involved in whatever mode of motorsport takes his fancy - they probally have strickt conditions forced apon them by Governing Bodies but they will be thereQuote:
Originally Posted by henners88
DO you honestly believe Piquet Jr what the ONLY one involved?
Well, whether he is banned or not, doesn't matter much for me. But I'm not really looking forward to Flavio's return to F1, let him be the past.
No, but since you summary is grossly inaccurate it speaks volumes itself about your attitude.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
EXAMPLE 1 - The first article you quote is full of factual errors. Anybody with any knowledge instantly recognises that.
Why, then, did you use it as a link if not to deliberately mislead?
EXAMPLE 2 - The second link quotes as follows "The essential difference between the McLaren and Renault cases seems to be that there is no evidence that Renault used the information, while incriminating emails emerged from McLaren suggesting that Ferrari data was being used by the British team."
That does not back up your claim. Far from it, it contradicts it.
EXAMPLE 3 - The third link merely quotes a Mclaren press release which was later withdrawn and the allegation within it retracted following an apology by Mclaren to Renault and the FIA.
In summary, either you do not know the facts or you are misleading the forum.