Not necessarily so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
What about the Aussies, Canadians, Americans?
Printable View
Not necessarily so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
What about the Aussies, Canadians, Americans?
Nice track, a little clinical, but the setting overcomes that.
As for the racing? For F1, pretty good at the end, but I cant say that was so stirring I am panting for next season. Taking away refuelling will make the racing MORE dull IMO
But is the track or the cars to blame? The GP 2 races were terrific. Also I have to say that had Lewis not retired, the race might have been thrilling. The situation was just like that - Red Bull dominated, Brawn GP were behind them and McLaren retired. That's it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Watching the YA(WN)S Marina race, I couldn't help but get the feeling that the extra-long front straight had the effect of making an already boring race, even more boring. I'm all for straight sections in an F1 circuit, but what's the point of a 3/4-mile long section when an F1 car acheives top speed in the first few meters? :s
Slipstreaming.Quote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
What they could've done with the circuit is put in some undulations in it, some on camber and off camber corners, and a variety of corner speeds.
Since the whole island is man-made, that shouldn't be too much of an effort for them.
Considering they built some huge hotel with ridiculous coloured lights all over it, its obvious they'd have nothing better to spend their money on.
If Webber is in genuine contention for the Australian grand prix victory next year, you will get a lot of crowd cheering.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Not to mention that adjacent hideous red monstrosity...Quote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
:p :
The final section into the hotel/marina the corners are off-camber. It looked obvious on TV.Quote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
But yes, I agree that the rest are gimmicks. I've come to the point where I have now ran out of excuses for Tilke. Bernie's vision for circuits is that they should resemble Norman Foster airports with fancy architecture for grandstands, pit and paddock complex.
China - plenty of land and corrupt officials and what do we get? A race track sitting ontop of a swamp! And what is it with the fixation for harbour settings?
The only good Tilke track is Turkey. Having seen Yas Marina now, I'm tempted to think of Istanbul more as an aberration for Tilke.
How many Tilke tracks are there now on calendar?
1. Sepang
2. Bahrain
3. Singapore
4. Valencia
5. Istanbul
6. Shanghai
7. Abu Dhabi
And Fuji, Nurburgring, Hockenheim and Barcelona have also had Tilke modifications to them.
I think it's time to stop. More than half the circuits are now designed by this man. It's enough.
My list was never intended to be exhaustive.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Totally agreed, the man is single-handedly wrecking F1 history. The best circuits are the best circuits because they've gradually evolved and changed over the decades. Like all evolutionary processes the poorer tracks are unloved and abandoned, while the Spas and Silverstones of the world adapt and thrive.Quote:
Originally Posted by aryan
You can't just plonk some tarmac in the desert and expect it to be an instant success, no matter how much money you throw at it.