I hate to defend Bernie too much, but do you not think his own business acumen might have had a little bit to do with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Printable View
I hate to defend Bernie too much, but do you not think his own business acumen might have had a little bit to do with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Hang on - you're not a Brit, yet you're commenting on something that happened in Britain! I don't see what point you are making about Finland.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
I don't know. And quite frankly this being a F1 issue were talking about, not inept government organisations, I' not going to spend time pondering what would happen if som thing like this came to public.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
I still would like to see a more detailed answer from you how you think MI5 is involved in this.
You don't think Bernie was hiding behind the wall operating the camera, do you? Hehehe!! :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
This is a carefully contrived show for the benefit of the media and the FIA meeting. Max is Bernie's greatest supporter and visa versa. We are being duped on a massive scale (again).Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
The objective is this latest controversy/battle is an attempt to allow Max to survive his last one. "Only Max can save us now." Give me a break. He needs to go down.
Interesting things about the FIA meeting as pointed out by Mark Hughes in Autosport:Quote:
Originally Posted by grantb4
Quote:
Two things should be made clear about the EGM: 1) It was Max who called it, Max who decided its date - and largely Max who decided what it would entail. 2) The vote of confidence on the agenda currently has no follow-up motion. So even if the vote goes against him, there is nothing in that motion that allows for any further action to be taken. Because it was Max who outlined the motion.
A cynic might say he chose to set up the EGM for precisely the purpose of reducing the chances of a disrepute charge being made against him, using it as a decoy. Like a magician, he's extremely adroit at inducing you to watch the rabbit and not the hands.
As can be seen, the odds are stacked in Max's favour...the really interesting part will be what happens if and when Max wins the vote.
Yes! a deceptive charade.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
No I don't, but you obviously gave it a thought already! :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
I will answer your question , even though you duck mine because you don't feel it's worth wasting your valuable time .Quote:
Originally Posted by janneppi
MI5 had an agent working surveillance , and his wife , a prostitute , took pictures of a private citizen and sold them to a rag .
This looked bad enough , that the agent's employment was terminated .
It is in no doubt that Max is not universally loved , and speculation has many on the suspect list .
That Ron Dennis was on that list is no surprise .
There is your link to F1 , if you needed more than Max himself . If it wasn't Ron , who was it ?
The fact that the security force of the nation has wives who sell photos of people in compromising positions to tabloids shows this may be a tactic used by the force .
A "sting" is entrapment . It's illegal .
Has anyone else been stung in this way ?
It remains to be seen , where the money originated , that paid for the surveillance that was said to be in place for 2 months before the pictures were released . Max said very quickly after the release , that MI5 had told him he was being watched .
That they knew , and knew so quickly , should be enough to cause wonder as to whether the service was involved . Add that a member had direct involvement through his wife , brings it to be obvious that questions would arise .
Who paid for that 2 months of watching Max ?
Why is it taking so long to find this out ?
I've asked this from the start .
It wasn't us , isn't enough . I want to know who it was .
IMO not linking MI5 to anything yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
Was the man fired(or moved to another job as psfan said) because
-his wife was working as prostitute and was an embaressement to MI5
-the man could be regonised as an MI5 agent and would not be able to work in that job
-he was part of a MI5 operation to get naughty pictures of Max Mosley and sell them to tabloids, but got caught.
First two sound helluva lot more plausable. ;)
How is ron Dennis linked to MI5? If it wasn't Ron, try some tabloid owned by The same guy who owns The Sunday Times, a paper whose writer has been sued by Mosley. A bit more plausable than Ron Dennis having MI5 do a sting on Mosley,if you ask me.Quote:
It is in no doubt that Max is not universally loved , and speculation has many on the suspect list .
That Ron Dennis was on that list is no surprise .
There is your link to F1 , if you needed more than Max himself . If it wasn't Ron , who was it ?
Now that's the first real indication of any involvement of MI5 to this case. Was MI5 doing the watching, or did they stuble into someone else watching Mosley. Latter would seem more plausable seeing it became a public matter. Perhaps the husband got suspicious of his wife's movement, followed her and notified his employer of what was going on.Quote:
The fact that the security force of the nation has wives who sell photos of people in compromising positions to tabloids shows this may be a tactic used by the force .
A "sting" is entrapment . It's illegal .
Has anyone else been stung in this way ?
It remains to be seen , where the money originated , that paid for the surveillance that was said to be in place for 2 months before the pictures were released . Max said very quickly after the release , that MI5 had told him he was being watched .
That they knew , and knew so quickly , should be enough to cause wonder as to whether the service was involved . Add that a member had direct involvement through his wife , brings it to be obvious that questions would arise .
I'd put my money rather on Rupert Murdoch that the British goverment.Quote:
Who paid for that 2 months of watching Max ?
No one who knows the real deal isn't willing to talk.Quote:
Why is it taking so long to find this out ?
If MI5 wasn't the culprit and know's who it was, their first oblication isn't to tell it all to the media. :)Quote:
It wasn't us , isn't enough . I want to know who it was .