The US is totally under Israel's thumb

The US has vetoed a resolution condemning Israel, while all other members of the Security Council had approved it. Despicable. Maybe we should start to call the US TIRA (The Israel Republic of America).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12512732

Quote:

---

Israeli settlements: US vetoes UNSC resolution

The US has vetoed an Arab resolution at the UN Security Council condemning Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territories as an obstacle to peace.

All 14 other members of the Security Council backed the resolution, which had been endorsed by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO).

It was the first veto exercised by the Obama administration which had promised better relations with the Muslim world.

A Palestinian official said the talks process would now be "re-assessed".

Washington was under pressure from Israel and Congress, which has a strong pro-Israel lobby, to use its veto.

---

Here's how it works in the U.S., Eki: if you're not pro-Zionist, then you're an anti-Semite. Any American not willing to send their last dime to Israel or send their kid to die for the Zionist cause is a Hitler lover. Anyone who wants to dispute that, read the Cranston Amendment and get back to me in due time.

TIRA. I like that. And yep, it's pretty much true.

Yep, put another white star in the US flag.

Well good for President Obama!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

All 14 other members of the Security Council backed the resolution, which had been endorsed by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO).

---

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html
Therefore, the Congress determines that the PLO and its affiliates are a terrorist organization and a threat to the interests of the United States, its allies, and to international law and should not benefit from operating in the United States.

Perhaps you can explain to me Eki why if the PLO have been declared to be a terrorist organization at law, why any resolution which has been endorsed by them should be voted for?

Secondly, the PLO which was rejected by both Lebanon and Jordan as having no right to exist, why should they be in control of a territory which should be rights be British?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rollo

Perhaps you can explain to me Eki why if the PLO have been declared to be a terrorist organization at law, why any resolution which has been endorsed by them should be voted for?

---

You could ask those 14 other Security Council members. I could declare you a terrorist, but would it make you a terrorist? I think the US is wrong in claiming the PLO to be a terrorist organization. It's PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), not PTO (Palestine Terrorist Organization).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

It's PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), not PTO (Palestine Terrorist Organization).

---

[youtube]gb_qHP7VaZE[/youtube]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

You could ask those 14 other Security Council members. I could declare you a terrorist, but would it make you a terrorist? I think the US is wrong in claiming the PLO to be a terrorist organization. It's PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), not PTO (Palestine Terrorist Organization).

---

It doesn't matter what its called really, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea isn't really "democratic" or "a people's republic" either. When you have the PLO, and its major factions with a stated purpose of "complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence." then what else would you like to call it.

The fact is that you don't like Israel and personally refuse to acknowlege either its history or the reason for its existance. That could be easily proven by simply bringing up previous threads.

eki, is this the 200th thread you have either started or diverted from other threads into a hate jews rant for this year alone.....

So what - we would do the same for our Euro friends. Let them build over here