The world is so big

It is taking some pain growing up realizing that the world doesn´t revolve around you. As a matter of fact, it doesn´t even have your father or mother as its center. You learn to accept that Hugos father could be stronger, and that there actually are other people deciding about cruical parts of your life.

Some time later you start to realize that due to historical wars, at least in the calmer parts of the world, states have been formed. Some are big. Being from Sweden with today nine million inhabitants, I was baffled by countries like India, or China, and still today I have difficulties coming to grips with how it must be living in a country like England/GB or the US. So many people, so many thoughts, so many expressions of human life I just can´t bear the thouht of it. It is like a soup about to boil; all of these people trying to make theyre way through the challenges of life. All these shattered and fulfilled dreams. And all of those disappointments, which tend to break some in the long run, while making others stronger, and more prune to hurt others.

While I was going on baffling about findings like these, I also came to understand that the earth is not the center of everything, nor is the sun. I was told that it takes light eight minutes to reach us from the sun, but i takes light four years to reach the closest star. On top of this our galaxy consist of billions stars, the galaxy itself was just one out of zillions...

And not only will the strange ways of life hit me with massive distances or populations in order to diminish little me. It also takes literally ages as its weapon of minimizing the importance of my existence. I am told that around 10 000 years ago man started the agricultural era. 10 000 years. Wow, that is some time... i mean... my grandfather was born in 1890, he was 49 when WW2 started. Nothing. Then I learned that from a geological point of view, 10 000 years was nothing to even bother about. Give us a 100 000 years and we can at least start talking erosion, and if you look closely, you will be able to notice a movement of tectonic plates. Give us a 1000 000 years, and we will notice some significabnt development when it comes to new species. Give us 10 000 000 years and a whole lot will have happened. But the earth is 5 000 000 000 years old. OK! I UNDERSTAND MY INSIGNIFICANCE, BUT WHY THE EXAGGERATIONS ALL THE TIME???!!! I GET THE MESSAGE!!!

I don´t know what to say more but: It is big and old and complicated out there girls and boys! Take care and do something nice, before time is putting its spell on you, and locks you up in its vast reservoir of nothingness. For ever.

Any more beer anyone?

I don't know what you're drinking Magnus but I want some! :D

Actually due to the increasing development of technology and efficience communication we are growing and developing in exponential speed. But due to that resource and food is becoming a big problem, there is only like what? 5% of area in the earth for proper cultivation, but we should be developing new ways such as "tower farming". Scientist say the population will reach 10billions and slowly decrease due to better improving economy, but right now I'm seeing those countries continues to be extorted and stripped off their resources. I don't know what's the problem with Scientist today, they have no moral and ethics and they're too bothers with crap like the higgs particles.

Another world war and we will be screwed, it almost happened with the Cuban missle crisis. This is the age of enslavement by corporate and banks, who controls the entire interest of the government, The Federal Reserve is a private company and does not answer to the US goverment (straight of the mouth of Alan Greenspan). I don't see how it is possible at this stage for the people to loosen from their grip to really advance as a species.

I think Stephen Hawking is right to a point that we need to leave the Earth and expand. Before this we have to really land a person on the moon first, Mars can wait.

Yeah history is interesting, it's not really made important in grade school anymore as I understand. I used to have some crazy neoconservative nut as a history teacher, it's crazy to see how all the student just sat there and listen to them. If I can get a quarter everytime I heard someone says: Why would I care about someone who died a thousand years ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by J4MIE

I don't know what you're drinking Magnus but I want some! :D

---

It's alcohol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnus

While I was going on baffling about findings like these, I also came to understand that the earth is not the center of everything, nor is the sun. I was told that it takes light eight minutes to reach us from the sun, but i takes light four years to reach the closest star. On top of this our galaxy consist of billions stars, the galaxy itself was just one out of zillions...

---

There are two theories to explain your perplexion, Geocentric theory an old theory introduced in 4th century BC or older saying that earth is center of the universe. Heliocentric is a modern theory which opposed to geocentric revealing that sun is center of the universe.

Macrocosm-microcosm is a schema of seeing the same patterns reproduced in all levels of the cosmos from the largest scale (macrocosm or universe-level) all the way down to the smallest (even up to the scalemetaphysical-level).

In the macrocosm scale our solar system including the sun, seven planets and their satellites are only minor measurement compared to the bigger substances as the part of the whole macrocosm.

Among those zillion of stars, the sun is the only one useful for human life and any living thing, the rest of it like the moon are decorating the sky, some of them form constellation that may be useful giving the clue about directions.

The sun is center of this universe. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leopardsleeping

There are two theories to explain your perplexion, Geocentric theory an old theory introduced in 4th century BC or older saying that earth is center of the universe. Heliocentric is a modern theory which opposed to geocentric revealing that sun is center of the universe.

Macrocosm-microcosm is a schema of seeing the same patterns reproduced in all levels of the cosmos from the largest scale (macrocosm or universe-level) all the way down to the smallest (even up to the scalemetaphysical-level).

In the macrocosm scale our solar system including the sun, seven planets and their satellites are only minor measurement compared to the bigger substances as the part of the whole macrocosm.

Among those zillion of stars, the sun is the only one useful for human life and any living thing, the rest of it like the moon are decorating the sky, some of them form constellation that may be useful giving the clue about directions.

The sun is center of this universe. :)

---

Thankyou lepslep, if you excuse me, but my baffling will not stop with this; no matter the explanation, it is still impossible to comprehend, and now I do not even drink beer :)

Besides: we do not know, and just possibly may never know, if there is life elsewhere.

My point is: it is fascinating being part of something which is so complicated/vast/old. But I guess thats why they invented religion in the first place.

Being very interested in math, allthough no being very skilled, I regard math as natures language, as does for example the above mentioned Stephen Hawking(with that littel difference that Stephen has a clue what he is doing). Math in its self provides moments of disbelief and fascination. Just look at Fermats Theorema and Andrew Wiles hunt for its proof, or just plain algebra.

Either way, I know that I am part of something which is just a glimpse in the eye of the history of our universe. With or without Heineken, I find that deeply fascinating.

When it comes to big numbers: I have heard somewhere that the number of atoms in the universe, which we atm can observe, is aroun 10^64. That is a lot... That means that the number of atoms in total couldn´t be more then maybe 10^65, at most 10^66. The number of elemnatparticles is around 10^80.
There is this number called Googol, which is 10^100. And then you have the googoolplex which is 10^(10^100). That IS a lot. If you used one particle (electron or whatever) fpr every digit, you still couldn´t write it out using every particle in the universe. In fact, you would lack around 100 000 000 000 000 000 000.

Well well, back to work

Its FAR too early in the morning for this. My head :grenade:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnus

When it comes to big numbers: I have heard somewhere that the number of atoms in the universe, which we atm can observe, is aroun 10^64. That is a lot... That means that the number of atoms in total couldn´t be more then maybe 10^65, at most 10^66. The number of elemnatparticles is around 10^80.
There is this number called Googol, which is 10^100. And then you have the googoolplex which is 10^(10^100). That IS a lot. If you used one particle (electron or whatever) fpr every digit, you still couldn´t write it out using every particle in the universe. In fact, you would lack around 100 000 000 000 000 000 000.

Well well, back to work

---

A few more numbers
Chess has 10^123 possible games that can be played
Go has 10^360

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnus

Thankyou lepslep, if you excuse me, but my baffling will not stop with this; no matter the explanation, it is still impossible to comprehend, and now I do not even drink beer :)

Besides: we do not know, and just possibly may never know, if there is life elsewhere.

My point is: it is fascinating being part of something which is so complicated/vast/old. But I guess thats why they invented religion in the first place.

Being very interested in math, allthough no being very skilled, I regard math as natures language, as does for example the above mentioned Stephen Hawking(with that littel difference that Stephen has a clue what he is doing). Math in its self provides moments of disbelief and fascination. Just look at Fermats Theorema and Andrew Wiles hunt for its proof, or just plain algebra.

Either way, I know that I am part of something which is just a glimpse in the eye of the history of our universe. With or without Heineken, I find that deeply fascinating.

---

Depends on how do you look at this universe and life problem, big and complicated, or narrow and easy. Technology makes border among continent or countries transparent, the sophisticated speed of Concord or Mirage are the answer that distance is no longer a problem. Internet facilitate people around the world meet on screen. Coincidence also, you might meet the same people at different forum, never think of people have the same interest on cranes... ;) . This proves that trying to think simple simplifies all the problem.

We might not need only look at the history of universe from knowledge point of view, as it might need philosophical approach the properer, just because there are some area which is out of human coverage. The more signs of universe such as star and crescent (moon) would always better than only star or any math sign to represent the said comprehensive approach. ;)