Would you sacrifice the remaining race at Darlington to have a dirt track on the Sprint Cup schedule?
Printable View
Would you sacrifice the remaining race at Darlington to have a dirt track on the Sprint Cup schedule?
no no no never. What is wrong with you?
:(
Nope, no way, uh-uh, never.
Now, maybe give up one of the New Hampshire races, or California, that I could see for a dirt race :up:
where should the dirt race be if they were gonna do that? eldora?
Darlington has to stay, NASCAR has ditch enough history recently. Its time they remembered where it came from.
To be honest i doubt NASCAR would have a dirt race these days. I do wish there were a couple more short tracks on the schedule. You feel like your watching them go round the same track week in week out sometimes. Crappy cookie cutters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haulin'AssAndTurnin Left
Forgive me for saying, but how many shapes can be got from a short track?
look at Bristol, Martinsville, North Wilkesboro (bring it back), Phoenix and Dover all completely different from one another and the racing is top notch. Bristol always sells out, Cali on the other hand struggles to get anywhere near capacity with half the amount of seating.
maybe add a dirt race to the truck series schedule, and make it a 26 race season for the trucks?
Bristol - top place - love it
Marstinsville - can't see the point.
North Wilks - only remember it from the game - great racing
Dover - love to death - so fast
Phoenix - not keen again
And yes all different - I only think of Bristol and Martin as short though.
And I also agree the California race wasn't great for racing - great for good cars, but agrree it could have been closer. Shows the yawning gap between the top and bottom teams mind.
yeah, those are tracks and Talladega and Daytona are the best tracks on the schudule, all those tracks have awesome racing, and are unneak in some way as apose to some of the cookie cuttersQuote:
Originally Posted by colinspooky