http://www.f1complete.com/content/view/8808/900/
Lame! Reminds me of Monza last year when DC was complaining about going over the kerbs.
Printable View
http://www.f1complete.com/content/view/8808/900/
Lame! Reminds me of Monza last year when DC was complaining about going over the kerbs.
Having seen them yet but at this moment in time I think its a disgrace!
They were perfectly fine as it was because it was progressive kerbing.
You could put a wheel on the normal flat kerbing but use half the car and you faced an even bigger kerb on the inside!
I went to Montreal in '04 , and the curbing is enough to frighten any driver out of thinking he might gain by going over instead of just close .
They are nice and flat inside , but get up on the back edge and you're fighting a 3 inch tall saw toothed pave stone wrecking machine that would give trouble to monster truck Grave Digger .
I don't remember specifically the turn towards the champions corner , but the description covers turns 3,4,5 and 6 .
Gnarly curbs . Not something you want to drive over with a road car , let alone an F1 car .
Last year Toyota had some trouble with kerbs at practice, so maybe this time they'll have a smoother run.
Alex Wurz on driving Le Mans:
Quote:
"Today turned out to be super difficult and it was a bit of a wake-up call actually," he said. "After 12 years in Formula One where every little bump is taken care of by the FIA, I come here to a real man's circuit. It was more of a fight than enjoyment but I always love the challenge of Le Mans."
No, they were pretty bad. During the NASCAR race last fall, one car broke a trailing arm on the curb. The car has 5 inches of ground clearance, and it broke a part that I've never seen fail before. Clearly there's something wrong with the track.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Shouldn't a curb be something you avoid? I think it's sad that race courses keep getting dumbed-down. When I was a kid, curbs were often these six or eight inch tall things drivers wouldn't think of short-cutting, and those cars had a lot more clearance than modern cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
Yes I absolutely agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Miatanut
http://b.f1-facts.com/ul/a/2714Quote:
When I was a kid, curbs were often these six or eight inch tall things drivers wouldn't think of short-cutting, and those cars had a lot more clearance than modern cars.
Yikes!
When does DC not complain thesedays...or Button with his whiney..."no TC and rain in Monaco is disaster"
On topic, they should keep the curbs the way they are....it makes the drivers work harder to go that faster but with a risk of damaging your car if you just keep riding them.
I was thinking more of these:Quote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
http://atlasf1.autosport.com/99/bel/...nostalgia1.jpg
I started following in '67, but there were still some of these around then.