PDA

View Full Version : Autoextremist weighs in on the "merger" situation...



SoCalPVguy
10th February 2008, 00:58
February 6, 2008

Once More into the Abyss.

By Peter M. De Lorenzo

Detroit. Ah yes, another racing season is upon us, and for major league open-wheel racing fans it means another year of pretending that things are okay, or wishing things would just get fixed, or wishing that NASCAR would just go away, etc., etc. Well, wishing isn't going to solve anything, as we all know. And with open-wheel racing media guru Robin Miller's latest dead-accurate reporting on yet another near-miss for a reunification plan - this one put forth by Tony George, the head of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and the Indy Racing League - which went nowhere, of course, open-wheel racing in the U.S. is once again assuming its recent role as a giant afterthought.

It's no secret that corporate America, the TV networks and the mainstream stick-and-ball media have all but given up on open-wheel racing in this country and left it for dead, with only the historic Indianapolis 500 mile race qualifying as legitimate news. The rest? Maybe if you're an average citizen in southern California on the Long Beach race weekend or around Cleveland for their Champ Car race you might hear something about a race going on, but that's about it. We all know the Perfect Storm of events that contributed to this mess, so I won't bother rehashing it here, because it's too tedious to even type. Suffice to say that we've watched the disintegration of a major league racing series right before our eyes over the last nine years, and it's flat-out depressing.

Even with all signs pointing to an agreement for the 2009 season that would have the top Champ car teams finally moving over to the IRL, if I'm a marketing honcho at a large American corporation, what could a sponsorship presentation for the IRL or one of its major teams possibly say to convince me that I should spend my company's money on major league open-wheel racing? That I'd be a big fish in a small pond? That I could become the overall sponsor of the IRL and "own" the series?

I can tell you right now how this would go down. If I'm a marketing pro with a non-racing sensibility, then I say "no," flat-out. The IRL, even with the best of the Champ Car teams added, delivers nothing for me, to Hell with the demographics. And that doesn't even begin to get into the TV ratings aspect of the whole thing, which would be laughable, if it already weren't so pathetic. No, the IRL in 2009 won't be able to rely on the standard sponsor presentations or dog-and-pony shows that racing series and racing teams put on today because they'll go nowhere.

Instead, the IRL will have to turn back the clock and mine corporate America's coffers the way it was done back in the old days. It may be hard to believe in this media-saturated, marketing-fueled NASCAR racing world that we live in today, but once upon a time corporate racing sponsorship didn't even exist. Even teams at the very top levels of racing (including F1) existed on the deep pockets of enthusiastic team owners. It wasn't until Colin Chapman showed up at Monaco in 1968 with his Team Lotus 49Bs painted in Gold Leaf tobacco livery that the whole sponsorship thing got rolling. Think about that for a moment, because racing sponsorship wasn't always a "given."

And even once Chapman got the ball rolling, the only real "sponsors" that racers landed were because the executives at the very top of these companies were racing enthusiasts and had the clout to make it happen. And there were no such things as meaningful or substantive ways to measure any of these advertising expenditures, either. Back then, it was because "the boss" wanted it to happen, and the board of directors didn't question his logic (at least they didn't if they wanted to be directors for very long). But for its time it worked, and racing fans benefited from it to be sure, because it grew the sport.

Remember the legendary Can-Am series? People often forget that it was sponsored by Johnson's Wax and the huge purses (for back then anyway) were the direct result of that company's involvement. Was there any logic to it? No. It was just because there were enthusiasts at the very top of the company who wanted to do it and went out and got it done. And where was the "home" of Can-Am racing back then? Road America, in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. And where is Johnson's Wax headquarters? Racine, Wisconsin, about an hour and a half away.

Did the Winston sponsorship in NASCAR's good old days happen because it was heavily researched and dissected? No, it happened because the guy at the very top of the company loved stock car racing. Even today, huge racing sponsorships are often the result of racing freaks deeply embedded in these companies - and with the decision-making power to get it done.

So whatever Tony George and his IRL sponsorship wranglers are doing, they're going to have to change their tune if they want to get started on 2009. Find the enthusiasts at these big companies in corporate America who will commit money to the IRL despite all of the negatives because they still love open-wheel racing after all these years of rancor.

From where I sit, that's their only shot.

A race with just three finishers. The car count is so shaky in Champ Car that they'll actually try to pawn-off a 16-car grid (if they're lucky) as a "full field." Given the nature of half the tracks they run on, it's conceivable that three cars will be left running at one of their races. Would you be surprised? I wouldn't be. Notgonnahappen.com? We'll see.

Beyond the Indy 500, no one will care about open-wheel racing in the U.S. See my point above about the unification of the two major open-wheel racing series in the U.S. The sad thing is that even with a unified series, open-wheel racing in this country just might be done. Unless Tony George grows some cojones and launches the sport into a new technological dimension (see "Fumes" AE # 430 - ed.), then I'm afraid the Indy 500 will be the last race standing for hard-core open-wheel fans.

Jacques
10th February 2008, 01:14
Be careful what you wish for.

Shirk
10th February 2008, 14:57
If I'm a marketing pro with a non-racing sensibility, then I say "no," flat-out. The IRL, even with the best of the Champ Car teams added, delivers nothing for me, to Hell with the demographics. And that doesn't even begin to get into the TV ratings aspect of the whole thing, which would be laughable, if it already weren't so pathetic.Especially considering that ever since 2002/03/04, the IRL already has had the best of the Champ Car teams in Penske, Team Green, Ganassi, Rahal etc. without significantly improving the IRL's popularity, just diminishing CART's reputation. It seems this has been TG's goal from the onset of the "split".

jimispeed
10th February 2008, 15:24
Especially considering that ever since 2002/03/04, the IRL already has had the best of the Champ Car teams in Penske, Team Green, Ganassi, Rahal etc. without significantly improving the IRL's popularity, just diminishing CART's reputation. It seems this has been TG's goal from the onset of the "split".


I agree.


And, what great drivers have the IRL brought up since??


Marco doesn't count, he's with the family.......


TG's been trying to be Champcar for quite some time!!

Alexamateo
10th February 2008, 15:50
And, what great drivers have the IRL brought up since??




Sam Hornish(19 wins), Dan Wheldon(13 wins), Tony Kanaan (12 of 13 wins IRL), Scott Dixon (10 of 11 wins IRL), Helio (12 of 18 wins IRL)

jimispeed
10th February 2008, 21:35
Sam Hornish(19 wins), Dan Wheldon(13 wins), Tony Kanaan (12 of 13 wins IRL), Scott Dixon (10 of 11 wins IRL), Helio (12 of 18 wins IRL)

Sam Hornish, Dan Wheldon..........


The rest are from Champcar

tbyars
11th February 2008, 02:14
Sam Hornish, Dan Wheldon..........


The rest are from Champcar

No, the rest are from CART. That is a totally different animal.

jimispeed
11th February 2008, 02:50
No, the rest are from CART. That is a totally different animal.


Same cars, same tracks, even some of the same engines!!

Whatever you say...........

garyshell
11th February 2008, 06:14
Sam Hornish(19 wins), Dan Wheldon(13 wins), Tony Kanaan (12 of 13 wins IRL), Scott Dixon (10 of 11 wins IRL), Helio (12 of 18 wins IRL)


Sam Hornish, Dan Wheldon..........


The rest are from Champcar


No, the rest are from CART. That is a totally different animal.


tbyars,

Technically yes that is correct, but jimispeed IS correct that only two of the five mentioned in answer to the original question of: what drivers have the IRL brought up since??

It's FENCE MENDIN' time, tbyars. It's not pot shot takin' time.

Gary

Chris R
11th February 2008, 13:50
DeLorenzo has hit the nail on the head regarding the historical position of sponsorship in AOWR and most forms of motor-sport. Racing has generally been a game for the wealthy and powerful and not much else.

As much as I enjoy my racing, I have never been under any illusions that racing sponsorship is a particularly good use of advertising money. Sure, I support companies that sponsor racing - but 10 or so cases of Valvoline I bought back in 1987-1990 probably did not pay for their Indy car sponsorship.

The problem that OWRS, IRL and the merged series all face is that there is nothing particularly interesting about any of them to lure wealthy hobbyists into the sport. Can-Am, CART, even USC and AAA all allowed the next guy who fancied himself a Roger Penske to show up with a "better idea" - spend his or her hard earned cash on their own special equipment stroking their ego and strutting their stuff... That I can make my customer car and crate motor run marginally better than yours has zero interest to me as a rich guy with an ego (Ok, I am not a rich guy with an ego - but you get the point).

Spec racing just doesn't have the allure of a more open formula series - NASCAR is going to find this out the hard way pretty soon too...

At any rate - a merger might shake out some sponsorship dollars - but ultimately the "new" series has to demonstrate some sort of value and more importantly, it has to provide and interesting and entertaining playground for the wealthy people who want to go racing and use their companies /business connections to support their hobby....

Look at Formula 1 - there is absolutely NO justification for the huge amount of money spent on the sport except that it strokes the egos of those involved... If any of the manufacturers diverted that funding to more traditional advertising they would get a better financial return....

As the spilt has well demonstrated, this sport is all about ego, it will succeed or fail based on how much ego satisfaction it provides to those with pockets deep enough to support it.... It just so happens that the same things that stroke the ego of rich folk make for pretty entertaining racing....