PDA

View Full Version : Cancelled TMS CART race in 2001.



Nem14
28th November 2012, 20:41
In Brian Carroccio's article (part 2) that looks back at past Indy Car CEOs, it says:


In July of 2000, Rahal along with Texas Motor Speedway President Eddie Gossage announced there would be a 2001 CART race at the 1.5 mile oval.
Of course, that race would ultimately be cancelled as drivers found the speeds too dangerous. The race was cancelled because CART discovered, just prior to the race, there were physical laws of nature that made it impractical to race CART Indy cars there at speed.
The slower IRL cars could race there, and had, with no problems related to physical laws of nature.

The story of how the race came to be cancelled is covered in chapter 33 - CART Screws Up Big Time - of Dr. Stephen Olvey's book - Rapid Response.

The medical staff determined the issues that led to the cancellation of the race.
However, Olvey says some drivers did express reservations to him about the track before they actually went there.

Testing at the track was done by Rahal's team on a "very cold" winter day, which limited the test car's top speed to 206 mph. Kenny Brack was the test driver.
Wally Dallenbach and Kirk Russel went on record against having an event at that track after just driving around the track in a rental car. They didn't like the sharp increase in angle going from the straights up onto the banking. Dallenbach and Russel also suspected that the cars would be going so fast at that track that safety would be compromised.
Some speculate that Rahal had his own agenda, but those voices in and out of CART that expressed concerns about the track were overruled/ignored.

After incidents both on and off the track during practice, CART's medical staff discovered that the banking angle and car speed (232 mph average practice speed) was causing drivers to suffer vertigo and/or G-LOC (G-force induced Loss Of Consciousness).

Olvey was given permission to look at proprietary G sensor information from Paul Tracy's car.
That information showed that drivers were being subjected to concurrent vertical (about 3.5G) and lateral G's (about 5.5G), something not previously experienced to that degree by open wheel race car drivers. Jet fighter pilots of the day didn't experience concurrent vertical and lateral G-loads either, and wore a G-suit when they expected to encounter more than 4G. In other words, there was no scientific literature about what happens to people subjected to concurrent vertical and lateral G-loads.

An emergency driver's meeting was called and it emerged that 18 of the 20 drivers had experienced symptoms related to excessive G-loading. The 2 drivers that had no symptoms had done less than 4 consecutive laps.
All 20 drivers would have likely had debilitating G-LOC symptoms after 6 or more laps during the race.

A meeting of CART management, team owners, track management, and tire/engine reps lasted 9.5 hours exploring ways to slow the cars down enough to avoid the driver G-loading problems.
No solutions were found, so the race was cancelled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-LOC

FIAT1
28th November 2012, 21:25
In Brian Carroccio's article (part 2) that looks back at past Indy Car CEOs, it says:

The race was cancelled because CART discovered, just prior to the race, there were physical laws of nature that made it impractical to race CART Indy cars there at speed.
The slower IRL cars could race there, and had, with no problems related to physical laws of nature.

The story of how the race came to be cancelled is covered in chapter 33 - CART Screws Up Big Time - of Dr. Stephen Olvey's book - Rapid Response.

The medical staff determined the issues that led to the cancellation of the race.
However, Olvey says some drivers did express reservations to him about the track before they actually went there.

Testing at the track was done by Rahal's team on a "very cold" winter day, which limited the test car's top speed to 206 mph. Kenny Brack was the test driver.
Wally Dallenbach and Kirk Russel went on record against having an event at that track after just driving around the track in a rental car. They didn't like the sharp increase in angle going from the straights up onto the banking. Dallenbach and Russel also suspected that the cars would be going so fast at that track that safety would be compromised.
Some speculate that Rahal had his own agenda, but those voices in and out of CART that expressed concerns about the track were overruled/ignored.

After incidents both on and off the track during practice, CART's medical staff discovered that the banking angle and car speed (232 mph average practice speed) was causing drivers to suffer vertigo and/or G-LOC (G-force induced Loss Of Consciousness).

Olvey was given permission to look at proprietary G sensor information from Paul Tracy's car.
That information showed that drivers were being subjected to concurrent vertical (about 3.5G) and lateral G's (about 5.5G), something not previously experienced to that degree by open wheel race car drivers. Jet fighter pilots of the day didn't experience concurrent vertical and lateral G-loads either, and wore a G-suit when they expected to encounter more than 4G. In other words, there was no scientific literature about what happens to people subjected to concurrent vertical and lateral G-loads.

An emergency driver's meeting was called and it emerged that 18 of the 20 drivers had experienced symptoms related to excessive G-loading. The 2 drivers that had no symptoms had done less than 4 consecutive laps.
All 20 drivers would have likely had debilitating G-LOC symptoms after 6 or more laps during the race.

A meeting of CART management, team owners, track management, and tire/engine reps lasted 9.5 hours exploring ways to slow the cars down enough to avoid the driver G-loading problems.
No solutions were found, so the race was cancelled.

G-LOC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-LOC)

Not to worry we won't have that problem for long time to come ,if ever.

call_me_andrew
29th November 2012, 03:53
Was this split from another thread or are we discussing history and trigonometry for kicks and giggles?

Andrewmcm
29th November 2012, 23:07
It's an interesting notion. People keep banging on about wanting "A Newwww Track Record" at Indy, but the fact is that we will ultimately end up at a point where humans cannot stand the forces that the cars will generate at a sufficiently high speed.

Yes, I know Texas has higher banking than Indy and so on, but Texas was a good insight into the fundamental limits of humans in racing cars.

Anubis
29th November 2012, 23:13
It's an interesting notion. People keep banging on about wanting "A Newwww Track Record" at Indy, but the fact is that we will ultimately end up at a point where humans cannot stand the forces that the cars will generate at a sufficiently high speed.

Or even if they can, they're less likely to survive the results of things going wrong at said speeds.

bricarr2
29th November 2012, 23:21
Andrew:


When I set out to write an article about Indy car CEOs I certainly did not foresee this discussion. However, you raise a fascinating point.

Making the race cars faster may not be the issue. Rather the human limits may be the issue that keeps speeds in check.

MAX_THRUST
4th December 2012, 22:45
I think at that time CART was strong and wanted to keep pushing the "Fastest series in the world" tag line. I was interested to read the above thanks for posting. It was an interesting season that year and the accident to Alex Z at Germany reminded everyone how dangerous ovals were. The series had a great mix of ovals and road, street circuits that year and for me being the first time I attended a race, still remains in my opinion the best season. Shame it all came to an end.

bricarr2
5th December 2012, 13:19
I think at that time CART was strong and wanted to keep pushing the "Fastest series in the world" tag line. I was interested to read the above thanks for posting. It was an interesting season that year and the accident to Alex Z at Germany reminded everyone how dangerous ovals were. The series had a great mix of ovals and road, street circuits that year and for me being the first time I attended a race, still remains in my opinion the best season. Shame it all came to an end.

Max:

You're right. CART had an incredibly deep field in 2001 and still 3 engine manufacturers. Sadly, they could never come to a consensus as to how to to grow the series going forward, and the indecision played right into Anton's hands.

Nem14
6th December 2012, 04:16
Alex didn't drive an Indy (or F1) car in 2000, the year the TMS race was cancelled. But, he got an Indy car ride with Mo Nunn for the 2001 season.

Alex Zanardi's incident at the Lausitzring in Germany happened on 9/15/2001, just a few days after the 9/11 terrorist attack on America.

Civic
6th December 2012, 09:32
A similar situation regarding the human body's physical limits is already happening in aerial warfare. There are already AAMs/SAMs and UCAVs in development that would exceed the performance envelope of any manned aircraft now or in the future.

I don't remember the aero package used but I'm assuming the cars were in superspeedway trim. I wonder if the short oval aero would've made the cars slow enough.

MAX_THRUST
7th December 2012, 16:34
Nem 14 Yes I know, The canceled race was also in the 2001 season not 2000, I only know this as I have the t-shirt that says so. Texas April 29th the race was scheddued for. How do i post a picture on here , I'll take a photo to prove it....

MAX_THRUST
7th December 2012, 16:37
Sorry this was during my anorak period. From 1996 to 2002 I knew so much trivia (dribble) about the series I was becoming a bit sad...Indeed Alex returned to drive for Mo Nun and had a lack luster season until the Germany race, where he was dominating but a bad fuel atrategy meant he had to pitt for that fatal pit exit collison with Alex Tag. The race was nearly canceled along with the UK event at Rockingham de to the events of 911. It was a very tough day at Rockingham with the crap weather, and a weeping track. No practise was run on the Friday and the Ssaturday due to the weather. I could go on but I think you get the gist of my post....

MAX_THRUST
7th December 2012, 16:41
See above 1st post.

In July of 2000, Rahal along with Texas Motor Speedway President Eddie Gossage announced there would be a 2001 CART race at the 1.5 mile oval.
Of course, that race would ultimately be cancelled as drivers found the speeds too dangerous.

Nem14
7th December 2012, 17:48
Yep! I F'd up the dates and you're right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firestone_Firehawk_600

call_me_andrew
8th December 2012, 03:39
The issue isn't pure speed. Acceleration around a corner is speed^2/radius.

Texas speeds in the corners at Indianapolis would produce 0.5 fewer g's because the turning radius is 100 feet wider.

nigelred5
13th December 2012, 13:05
The issue isn't pure speed. Acceleration around a corner is speed^2/radius.

Texas speeds in the corners at Indianapolis would produce 0.5 fewer g's because the turning radius is 100 feet wider.

Exactly. Even then, they aren't producing the concurrent G-loads at Indy due to the significantly lower banking. I don't have numbers but they can't possibly be producing anywhere near the vertical g's at Indy, it's the lateral g's. Remember, they were experiencing concurrent g loads running higher sustained speeds through the long banking at TMS. Higher than the average lap speeds Indy where the cornering loads last but a few seconds with the long straits having essentially zero g loading. they were basically trying to drive in a centrifuge. Probably the closest sensation I can think of the average person can experience is from some of the Hypercoasters at amusement parks these days. Several have huge horizontal heavily banked loops after a 200-300 foot decent that puts huge combined loads on the riders, but only for a few seconds 1x, and yet I've actually seen people pass out in those turns. The human body simply could not sustain that kind of load for hours. They proved they had reached the limit of the human body at that track. I actually found that incredibly exciting, amazing and frightening all at the same time. It wasn't the way we would have envisioned or the outcome we wanted on track, but we proved the CART cars were far faster than the IRL machines that day. Dangerously so. They simply had about 400 HP too much back then at that track.

Spafranco
11th January 2013, 13:26
[quote="Nem14"]In Brian Carroccio's article (part 2) that looks back at past Indy Car CEOs, it says:

The race was cancelled because CART discovered, just prior to the race, there were physical laws of nature that made it impractical to race CART Indy cars there at speed."

Where have you found Part 2 since part 1 is what is showing? Thanks in advance.

bricarr2
17th January 2013, 19:30
AutoRacing1.com - Other Racing News and Car Test Page (http://www.autoracing1.com/article.asp?tid=3873#3873)

Spafranco, Here is part 2 of CEO article

bricarr2
17th January 2013, 19:31
AutoRacing1.com - Other Racing News and Car Test Page (http://www.autoracing1.com/article.asp?id=3885)

My bad, here it is

Mark in Oshawa
17th January 2013, 23:00
All Remember 20 drivers were talked to, 18 complained of G loc symptoms...and one of the ones who was OK was PT. Not sure what that says, but the bull like neck on the man probably says volumes about his abilities to take G's....

bricarr2
17th January 2013, 23:14
True Mark. I remember (could be wrong) but Da Matta was one of the outspoken guys. Of course, CDM is nowhere near as thick through the neck and shoulders as PT.

Wonder when this will come up next. But TMS '01 was an interesting study in not the mechanical limits but human limits of speed.

EagleEye
10th February 2013, 16:16
True Mark. I remember (could be wrong) but Da Matta was one of the outspoken guys. Of course, CDM is nowhere near as thick through the neck and shoulders as PT.

Wonder when this will come up next. But TMS '01 was an interesting study in not the mechanical limits but human limits of speed.

Michael Andretti was the most vocal about canceling the race. He was very emotional about it, to the point he was near tears.

Big Mo's big crash, started in turn 2 (not 3 as on Wikipedia in correctly states) and he bounced off the inside and outside walls until coming to rest between turns 3 and 4.

Despite a lot of meetings, come race day the cars were lined up on pit lane, some with their engines started as everyone prepared for the warm-up. Some cars were missing drivers, Andretti, Dario, and a few others. The Ganassi drivers were in their cars.

Then the warm up was delayed, and even before the race had been canceled, we were planning our route to the charter flight parked at the nearby Alliance airport.

Even if the race had gone off, it looked like there would have been few fans in the stands, which might have been another reason to go ahead and cancel. There was a car flee market going on in one of the main parking lots that same morning, and the crwod there was significantly bigger than we had in the stands for the warm-up.