Thread: Future Rally Media Coverage
-
21st Dec 11, 15:13 #41
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 54
Was the problem with F1 the exorbitant fees involved? If so there is no way that WRC could command comparable figures. Maybe the BBC could get a bargain in comparison.
I think a smart move on North Ones or whoever's part would be to give the rights to a any terrestrial channel for a nominal fee. Maybe that would help raise the awareness and interest for te WRC.
-
21st Dec 11, 15:19 #42
Ignoring the many obvious flaws with this post, let's for a moment be hopelessly unrealistic and assume that in your wildest dreams 100,000 people respond to your e-petition - the threshold at which it may (or may not) be considered for debate in Parliament. That's out of a population of 70 million or so. By your logic why should the BBC be at the whim of such a tiny minority of people?
I admire your aim, but you're deluded if you think a petition is the way to go about achieving it.Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
21st Dec 11, 17:43 #43
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 28
Well if the bbc annouced that they were doing away with eastenders their would be a petition in seconds its worth a go it doesnt cost a thing your all being defeatist.
If it doesnt get broadcasted to a wider tv audience sponsors wont be forth coming dont forget the likes of Ford and Citreon use it as advertisement also (How many DS3 are a round now?). Why would other manufactures consider it if there is a small tv audience.It is not 'the taxpayer' that pays for the BBC, but the licence fee payer. There is a difference. And in no way is it 'the fans' that need to make the first move. The likes of the BBC will only ever want to take up WRC coverage again if there is something worth covering, which, at the moment, there isn't. In short, your sentiments are well-meaning but misguided
BDunnell your stuck in the past looking back at the rallies form the 1980s and 1990s (in another post about tv coverage) how are you going to get anything anywhere near those crowds without getting it on to a main tv channel theres no harm in trying.
-
21st Dec 11, 17:52 #44
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 28
so what are these flaws you talk about? Also what way would you go about it since im deluded? As i have said before their are to many people who just moan and will not try anything.Ignoring the many obvious flaws with this post, let's for a moment be hopelessly unrealistic and assume that in your wildest dreams 100,000 people respond to your e-petition - the threshold at which it may (or may not) be considered for debate in Parliament. That's out of a population of 70 million or so. By your logic why should the BBC be at the whim of such a tiny minority of people?
I admire your aim, but you're deluded if you think a petition is the way to go about achieving it.
-
21st Dec 11, 17:52 #45
It is a vicious circle, you're right, but not one that will be broken by a petition to the BBC.
A past in which people wanted to watch rallying. Maybe if the powers-that-be had also got stuck there, the sport wouldn't be in this mess, and lacking decent British TV coverage. All these issues go much deeper than a lack of enthusiasts sending e-mails to the Director-General of the BBC.
-
21st Dec 11, 17:57 #46
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 28
So in your opinion what are these issues?A past in which people wanted to watch rallying. Maybe if the powers-that-be had also got stuck there, the sport wouldn't be in this mess, and lacking decent British TV coverage. All these issues go much deeper than a lack of enthusiasts sending e-mails to the Director-General of the BBC.
-
21st Dec 11, 17:59 #47
-
21st Dec 11, 18:41 #48
It seems to me that the core issue is getting a larger fan base for the WRC and I don't think additional TV coverage will necessarily guarantee that. There has to be investment on all sides for the WRC to grow and the only thing I can do as a fan is to bring as many people to the sport as possible. I have gotten at least a dozen friends involved in watching WRC over the past 2 years, which may not seem like a lot, but if they each brought 12 people to the WRC, etc., that is how grass-movements grow. it would be hard for me to imagine that any fan of motorsports wouldn't enjoy rallying if they were exposed to it by a person who could explain the rules, scoring, tactics, driving techniques, etc. As a passionate WRC fan, I would love more/better footage but that is mostly because I am WRC crazy. I think the footage that is available is acceptable for bringing new people to the sport, it just needs to be made more widely available. I would like to see all broadcasts aired, in full, on WRC.com as soon as they are available. I have other means to get them myself but it needs to be made simple for the average viewer.
-
21st Dec 11, 19:29 #49
-
21st Dec 11, 21:14 #50
What is happening to TV and internet coverage - what are this years promises?
-
21st Dec 11, 22:07 #51
today on eurosport i saw that they are going to cover the event...it was part of their January motorsport coverage schedule. No details though...
-
21st Dec 11, 22:46 #52
You mean MC Rally NOT?
-
22nd Dec 11, 01:35 #53
-
23rd Dec 11, 22:33 #54
I haven’t been so interested how the commercial part works between FIA, the promoter of WRC, sponsors and teams but the recent news about NOS and the coverage of WRC have changed my mind.
In the Tuesday issue of “Helsingin Sanomat” (biggest daily newspaper in Finland) there was in the sports section an article called news analysis. There the writer says that: “the most important source of income for the WRC has been the TV rights”. He also says that: “Antonov’s other business are in bad shape and FIA haven’t seen a cent of the millions promised by CSI”.
Things that are clear is:
- The sponsor of a team pays the team to get media coverage via the promoter.
- The promoter pays FIA to have the TV rights.
What is unclear for me is:
- Sponsors as Abu Dhabi, Nokia etc. pays FIA or the promoter (which one?) to get media coverage.
- FIA gets the money for the TV rights.
- If the TV rights is the most important income for WRC, does the teams benefit anything from this or does it all go to FIA?
-
3rd Jan 12, 00:32 #55
In this case, I'm not sure that no news are good news...
-
5th Jan 12, 20:49 #56
Looks like shot in the feet for FIA, they banefited from tv rights killing WRC at the same time (in long run). Just want to share my remarks, Mini has greater pubicity from Rally Dakar than will have from the whole series of WRC this year. Lets make one step back and start from beginig - bring back Eurosport to WRC to get publicity.
-
6th Jan 12, 01:53 #57
WRC's site says that next season Eurosport is going to broadcast highlights. Does anyone knows something more about this?
World Rally Championship - Fanzone - WRC TV Guide
-
6th Jan 12, 07:09 #58
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Latvia
- Posts
- 320
-
6th Jan 12, 08:49 #59
Would like to bring back this one, a lot of good points here.
Not much has happened in a year, and no plan to develop either has been presented.
Everyone from the top down i FIA says that Rally is a sport where the Internet should play a vital role, in addition to TV.
There are a lot of smart people on the forum, what could be done to improve the Internet part of the media show?
-
6th Jan 12, 12:01 #60



272Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks