Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 68 of 68
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Engine Equivalency - The Facts

  1. #61
      F1boat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    9,534

    Default

    As I said before, let's wait for Oulton Park. Thruxton is a track which is normally to benefit turbos and it has enormous straights. And yes, the turbos had an advantage, but IMO not as big as in Donington Park.
    Formula 1

  2. #62
      Bruce-1980's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Alfa Fan, you haven't addressed a single point i've made, never mind comprehensively demolishing my arguments! (Points, not arguments. Children argue.)

    I'll spell it out for you...

    (All points refer to Thruxton as the boost restrictions had been applied.)

    Please bear in mind, Thruxton is the fastest track on the calendar.
    The turbo cars should have a small speed advantage here to compensate for the disadvantages they will face at other, tighter circuits.

    Plato qualified 2 places behind Neal - Not a huge way down the field.

    Plato binned it in race 1 but before he did he was 0.063 secs off the over all fastest lap of race 1.

    Plato started from the back in race 2 and finished 8th, 0.166 seconds off fastest lap which was set by his team mate (who doesn't have a turbo).
    On his way up the field he passed:
    Tom Boardman (S2000 Turbo),
    Tony Gilham (S2000 Turbo),
    Paul O'Neill (S2000),
    Jeff Smith (S2000 Turbo),
    Andy Neate (S2000 Turbo),
    Robert Collard (S2000),
    John George (S2000),
    Nick Foster (S2000)
    Liam Griffin (S2000 Turbo)

    Plato won race 3... and set fastest lap... by 0.376 seconds!

    Plato was 2.2mph down (3 race average from the fastest speed trap in the country)

    And you still think he's at a disadvantage!?

    Were you watching BTCC last time Alan Gow was in charge? If you were, you will know he's the best man for the job! He's firm but fair, he wont take **** from anyone (Including Plato) and his main objective is to keep the racing close! Close racing make the BTCC what it is, why would anyone want one team to have an unfair advantage over anyone else? Maintaining parity between two very different types of car is an almost impossible task and Alan appears to have pretty much nailed it after only 2 meetings! I'd say he's done a good job! But as F1Boat says, lets wait for Oulton.

    My prediction is, if anyones gona have an advantage at Oulton, it's gona be Plato!
    Last edited by Bruce-1980; 20th May 11 at 08:58.

  3. #63
     
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69

    Default

    OMG why are we hearing cries of 3mph down on the straights!! blah blah blah!!! A race is more than top speed!! To have the FASTEST lap of the race on a FAST circuit whilst being slightly down on top speed MUST mean your car is faster elsewhere! DOH its not rocket science!

    Plato couldn't be caught in race 3, he was faster. full stop.

    His qualifying this season is exactly on par with the last 2 seasons, if anything he is closer to pole this year then previous years.

    The fastest tracks are now out of the way and considering how quick his lap times were at these circuits (remember his top speed is down so his cornering speeds must be higher) he will be in a much stronger position at the next rounds. Well assuming he doesnt drive the car faster than it will go.....

  4. #64
      Alfa Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,596

    Default

    Well at least if I'm wrong it backs up my old hypothesis that Rob Collard is a truly terrible driver!
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  5. #65
      Torg22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfa Fan View Post
    Well at least if I'm wrong it backs up my old hypothesis that Rob Collard is a truly terrible driver!
    You having a laugh?? Ive had nothing but respect for the bloke this year, hes been driving the wheels off of his beemer.

  6. #66
      Bruce-1980's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Must admit, I've always liked Collard!

    Looks like we not gona agree on anything does it mate!

  7. #67
      Alfa Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,596

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Torg22 View Post
    You having a laugh?? Ive had nothing but respect for the bloke this year, hes been driving the wheels off of his beemer.
    Please read what I said carefully. Rather than jumping to conclusions. I know there's lots of complicated words in there.
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  8. #68
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    3,094

    Default

    Bruce. Alfa. Let's just agree you're both idiots and I'm right. V8s for everyone!
    Anyone remember when these signatures used to be funny?

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Visitors found this page by searching for:

which is greater 17.066 or 17.06

engina equivalency

plato gets turbo weight

equivalency cars

ford ngtc engin spec

NGTC engine spec:motorsportforums.com

turbo engine facts

LPG-turbo powered Ford Focuses of Tom Chilton bhp

ngtc engine spec

what is greater 17.06 or 17.066

ngtc engine torque

Which one is less 17.06 or 17.066

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •