Results 51 to 60 of 91
Thread: UK General Election 2015
-
9th May 2015, 10:02 #51
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
Average hours in the UK is 43.6
This works out to be:
£6.50 * 40 = £283.40
£260.00 * 52 = £14,736
£14,736 - £10,600 = £4136
Assessed at 20% = £827.20
That works out to be an effective rate of taxation of just 5.61%
Last year, my effective rate of taxation was 18.383%
Admittedly, I don't live in the UK but, 5.61% seems like a fairly reasonable sort of rate to pay for the trappings of civilisation like roads, schools, hospitals, the defence forces, the judiciary and what not.
Also, abolishing of income tax for minimum wage folks isn't going to encourage more people to work. Income tax is an end cost; not an initial input driver in the equilibrium position of wages.
The best solution would be to set a rate on passive income (such as dividends, rents and bonuses) at something like 50%, which would change the nature of capital flows. Then have government directly employ more people, which would have effects on labour markets.The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
-
9th May 2015, 13:06 #52
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- South East England
- Posts
- 1,490
- Like
- 232
- Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
Hmmm maybe you're right. It's just the pressure and another long night talking...
SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.
-
9th May 2015, 22:30 #53
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,778
- Like
- 3
- Liked 50 Times in 33 Posts
Well, leaving the EU is now a genuine risk, the Tory right wing will paralyse any attempt by Cameron to fight for staying in.
Also life is going to get very tough for anyone who relies on any form of benefits or tax breaks whatsoever. £12 billion of welfare savings isn't going to come from nowhere.
- Likes: rjbetty (10th May 2015)
-
10th May 2015, 13:04 #54
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- South East England
- Posts
- 1,490
- Like
- 232
- Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
Yes I am rather concerned about this. It's good in some ways they want people to pull their socks up and get in to work, but some people genuinely are in situations where this would be unfeasible. For example, it is possible to be unwell yet not be able to get an official diagnosis (I know for a fact not every person is a faker).
It's a shame they won't be at all hard on the rich in any way...
As for the EU, I actually may not mind a moderate amount of distancing to happen as I do believe there is a lot of corruption in Europe.Last edited by rjbetty; 10th May 2015 at 13:06.
SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.
-
10th May 2015, 18:09 #55
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- To the right of the left
- Posts
- 3,746
- Like
- 3
- Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
"Old roats am jake mit goats."
-- Smokey Stover
-
10th May 2015, 18:19 #56
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Old Trafford
- Posts
- 6,991
- Like
- 23
- Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
-
11th May 2015, 00:49 #57
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
The thing is though, if you exempt retirement funds from taxation, then that's where capital gets diverted. Capital is like water, it follows the path of least resistance.
The effects of that in Australia, have been that capital from retirement funds have flowed directly into the housing market. That's fine except that the price of a house in Sydney in particular has risen from 4.3 times average wage in 2000 to more than 10 times today.
First-home buyers account for less than 2% of home loans in NSW. I mean that's cool, provided you don't mind locking an entire generation from the housing market.The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
-
11th May 2015, 00:55 #58
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- To the right of the left
- Posts
- 3,746
- Like
- 3
- Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
-
11th May 2015, 01:08 #59
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Old Trafford
- Posts
- 6,991
- Like
- 23
- Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
-
11th May 2015, 02:44 #60
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
I ask the question of who it's more ethical to extract taxation from - those who actually work for a living, or those who live off of the work of others?
In principle, all the income derived from dividends, interest and rent, all comes from the real work of people who actually do work. Despite what the financial sector would like to have us believe, their income comes about by the condensation of capital to the existing pile.
When bankers and financial institutions get paid millions and derive millions in profit, where did the actual work come from to derive that profit?The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
I quite understand the need for safety briefings but the threats and it's how it's being communicated that seems to me extremely heavy-handed. And the similar NW Stages closed-road rally didnt...
British & Irish Championships...