Results 1 to 10 of 62

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by schmenke View Post
    :cornfused: Brown was never charged and was never on trial.
    Exactly.
    He was "deprived of life"; "without due process of law". That is a violation of the Fifth Amendment.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,746
    Like
    3
    Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    Exactly.
    He was "deprived of life"; "without due process of law". That is a violation of the Fifth Amendment.
    What part of Airshifter's post (#55) did you not understand?
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    6,137
    Like
    647
    Liked 677 Times in 473 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    Exactly.
    He was "deprived of life"; "without due process of law". That is a violation of the Fifth Amendment.
    Brown was deprived of life when he chose to assault a cop who, by law, had a legal right to protect himself and the community.

    The fifth exists to protect citizens against unwarranted prosecution. Had Brown intentionally killed by a cop (or other government authority) without arrest, trial, etc, that would be a violation of the fifth.

    In this instance, the right to self preservation would have existed even if Wilson had not been a cop. It's part of that inherent right to life you claim doesn't exist within US law. Based on your attempts to twist the fifth to find fault in the US system, no person would have such right to self preservation. A court would decide if they had that right after they were possibly dead.


    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    This bit:


    It's not true.

    Notwithstanding the fact Cohens v. Virginia (1821) also upholds the fact that state law does not override federal law; certainly not rights.
    You may want to better inform yourself about the facts. Wilson's case was handled by a state court and was not a federal proceeding.

  4. Likes: driveace (15th December 2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •