Results 41 to 50 of 52
Thread: De Ferran back in the game
-
19th February 2010, 02:11 #41
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NickFalzone
perhaps you should suggest a biz forum to the administratorsSarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
19th February 2010, 16:44 #42
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Starter
is the biz of the sport off limits?Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
19th February 2010, 19:00 #43
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StarterSarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
19th February 2010, 19:26 #44
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken
The point is that this is a DISCUSSION FORUM. You almost never want to discuss anything. You "post without comment". THAT is what gets really old. If you would at the very least present your plan on how those ratings, that you so eloquently point out are part of "the biz", could be better then at least we could have a DISCUSSION about "the biz".
I know, I know, you don't have to tell me again, I won't click on your threads. They bore me anyway because you don't DISCUSS anything in them.The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
19th February 2010, 22:22 #45
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chuck34Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
22nd February 2010, 06:00 #46
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by chuck34
Ken, isn't that I dont think you are smart enough or enough of a fan of the sport to comment, I think you could add something or toss out an opinion or two what could be done to change it. THAT is the point of the forum. Some threads we talk about what happens on track, but the last few years, it is the business side. To say week after week the ratings suck or the sport is in trouble is one thing, but add something please.
As for DeFerran, many see this as a half empty glass, becuase his 2 car team didn't materialize and Jay Penske isn't adding cars. The reality of it is, I for one couldn't see how DeFerran was going to go Indycar racing. If NHL couldn't get sponsorship for Graham Rahal, I like to know what hoofa pipe people would have been smoking to think Gil was going to field 2 cars in a series he hadn't owned a team in. A series that by the way cant keep good teams with sponsors on the track, and cannot get money to really strong teams traditionally to keep American born talent.
So I can see the pessimists being correct, but any time anyone has Gil involved, it is BETTER than not having him involved."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
22nd February 2010, 14:45 #47
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
another case of classic projectionSarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
22nd February 2010, 15:42 #48
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 2,443
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not to get in the middle of everyone's squabble - but I really think all of you guys have a great knowledge of and passion for AOWR and often racing in general.... I realize there are different points of view - but all of you: ken, mark, chuck, scott, gary (please read NOTHING into the order or who I have included or left out) etc. are really into this sport and have really good knowledge and valuable opinions.....
My point is, we are all on the same team (and it is really a pretty small team...) and I hope everyone keeps that in mind when these different points of view and personal differences come up so we can agree to disagree on various things and move on as united fans of the sport.... it is a pretty rough time to be fan of AOWR and we are all going to get negative and we are all going to have our pie-in-the-sky ideas...
ok, I'll climb down off my soapbox now.... sorry if I overstepped any bounds......
-
22nd February 2010, 15:55 #49
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris R
My only thing is that Ken seems to want to only point out negative things like rating (which we all know about), and then not discuss it. All I'm asking (and ever asked him) is that he acutally discuss things, not "post without comment" as he likes to do. That's all I'm trying to say in these posts.
I try not to get into personal attacks with anyone although I disagree with them from time to time. It's just sometimes people need to be called out on some things. Maybe I shouldn't do it. But all I'm looking for are constructive ideas to move the sport forward.
Ok this is waaaay off topic now, so let's try to get back to it. Sorry.The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
22nd February 2010, 16:10 #50
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
why is reality always confused with negativity
*it sure is interesting who is actually hung up on the ratings.....Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
Magnussen would be dealt with in my time says Villeneuve. “In my time, Magnussen would no longer be so aggressive”, Jacques Villeneuve told Sport1. “We would have pushed him into the wall and made...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...