Results 61 to 70 of 90
-
9th January 2010, 22:48 #61
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,709
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garyshell
Performance
At Magny-Cours in 2009, the best qualfying time for a Superleague Formula car was 1:26.391, almost 11.5 seconds slower "115.2 %" than the fastest qualifying time for an F1 car in 2008 of 1:15.024.[14] Both Superleague Formula and Formula One will be racing at Monza in 2009 where a real time comparision will be possible assuming conditions such as rain are similar. The fastest F1 time at the 2009 Italian Grand Prix happened during a dry second session of qualifying and was 1:22.955. A month later, also during a dry qualifying, the fastest SLF time at the 2009 Monza Superleague Formula round was 1:36.444, 13.5 seconds slower "116.2%".
These are a bit slower relative than an Atlantic car. Too close to call actually.
Seems they perform , based on times, a lot like an Indy Light.
rh"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
-
9th January 2010, 23:25 #62
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Hoop-98
Also, I remember it was floating around here years ago that when the IRL first looked at putting the Dallara on the road course at Road Ohio, the first test had it barely as fast as an Atlantic. Now I wonder about the veracity of that but I believed it naively at the time....."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
9th January 2010, 23:47 #63
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,709
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
The acceleration should be similar to an Indycar but either for aero, or balance (big heavy engine in rear) it's on-track times where we can compare it to GP2's and f1's were extremely slow.
You think you may have been mislead by a certain clique eh lol....
Cars are cars, times are times, and they are what they are.
The types of tracks make a lot of difference, the DP01 was faster than the Lola on 1/2 the tracks, slower on the other half.
A narrow car with lots of downforce straightens out chicanes and esses real well, but would look a lot slower on acceleration and fast tracks.
Bends made to slow down a champ car might be flat in an .016.
I did my best to approximate performance levels above, no idea why the DP09 Ferrari is so slow.
Also for a 4.2 Litre V12 engine to make only 25-50 more HP than the old 3.5 Indys at 1400 more RPM makes no sense.
Either the car has low aero, bad balance, the track was 6 seconds off the 4 times (although all were dry sessions) we have times for, or the advertised data for the car is optimistic.
Maybe those are ponys not horses, I do not know.
rh"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
-
10th January 2010, 00:32 #64
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 199
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The panoz was only raced for one year and no one was allowed to develop it. How much faster would it have been if it had been around for another year and the teams were allowed to do some updates on it.
I think it was a very good car that never got to show its true speed.
-
10th January 2010, 00:37 #65
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,709
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spiritone
They wanted a cheaper car that lapped faster, they removed the aero restrictions.
All cars until then 'went too fast" and got penalized.
Look at the tunnel exits of it and a Lola, with that dimension no telling how fast a Lola would be.
If we still ran 2001 rules Indycars would be setting Ken's "new track record"!!
The cars go as fast as they do because of rules, not good or better.
With Champcar rules F1 cars would be off the scale fast.
The last 2 sentences are my opinion...
rh"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
-
10th January 2010, 08:34 #66
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Posts
- 66
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To the original topic, I believe this highlights why the IndyCar Series needs leadership that not only understands the history & tradition of open-wheel racing but also a grasp on the present with an eye for the future. That certainly isn't residing with the current leadership....at least by all visible indications.
-
10th January 2010, 13:47 #67
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Hoop-98
-
10th January 2010, 15:56 #68
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,709
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
rh"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
-
10th January 2010, 18:19 #69
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- North Center, Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 2,107
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garyshellMost posters on this forum can't think past their own screen names...
-
10th January 2010, 18:24 #70
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- North Center, Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 2,107
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvopMost posters on this forum can't think past their own screen names...
Rally2 must stay separated from the main WRC manufacturer competition. That's the only way to keep them affordable, level and privateer friendly. The sport can not afford to destroy Rally2 class and...
WRC main class in 2025