Results 21 to 28 of 28
-
2nd November 2009, 20:02 #21
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DexDexterRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
2nd November 2009, 21:53 #22
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ioanWhen in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
2nd November 2009, 21:54 #23
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ioanWhen in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
2nd November 2009, 21:55 #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Valve BounceRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
2nd November 2009, 22:21 #25
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 25,223
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
Wow! I really wish I would have had more time at least to watch this unfold.Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro
-
2nd November 2009, 22:37 #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Georgian Bay, On.
- Posts
- 3,513
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sort of back on track figureratively.
Wonders will never cease.
I agree with Ioan!
They fuel and tire regulations will mean fairly major redesigns and placement of the fuel will be very touchy.
I also wonder if the constant changing of the tire regs had anything to do with Bridgestone's coming withdrawal, although the fuel regs would have required new compounds too.
I am mulling over that and may posts some more thoughts in the tire thread later about what might happen.
-
3rd November 2009, 02:15 #27
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Nothing wrong in his statement.
A very standard general statement of optimism about 2010.
I'm not exactly sure what you are taking issue with.
Its far from B.S. and speaks more about your dislike for Mclaren than anything Whitmarsh has said.
I fully expect the same statements form every other teams, full of optimism for 2010.you can't argue with results.
-
3rd November 2009, 02:21 #28
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Drifter
I don't blame Bridgestone for leaving. Thoose changing tire regs cost them millions each year and the uncertainty only means more last minute R&D and unnecessary costs.
i think that several teams have a natural advantage int terms of designing the 2010 cars, it would be teams that have understood and built successful cars that didn't require refueling in the past. That includes, McLaren, Renault, Ferrari, Williams, and Newy via RBRyou can't argue with results.
Ya' awl boyz got Badgered this race! :stareup: :dork: :wave: Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Fgp 2024