Results 61 to 70 of 134
-
12th October 2009, 19:30 #61Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,920
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Actually, the Norwegian's handle the Peace Prize, which is what Nobel requested. I think the 5 committee members come from various Norwegian political parties and more often than not have a more liberal outlook. But, thats just the way it happens to be. There is no conspiracy there, just a prize and a million dollar check. It's not like the winner gets made King of the World or God. It's more like being voted "best of show" at a dog show. Sure other mutts can do other things but this is the mutt that won.
Originally Posted by BDunnell
If legislation makes you equal, you aren't.
-
12th October 2009, 19:50 #62Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Yes, the award of the peace prize to Henry Kissinger certainly indicated the liberalism of those involved, didn't it?
Originally Posted by Fiero 5.7
-
12th October 2009, 22:38 #63Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You are not insinuating that Kissinger was a conservative are you?
Originally Posted by BDunnell
-
12th October 2009, 22:49 #64Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Brighton, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 1,336
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh yes, the Committee saw fit to give a peace prize to Henry Kissinger, because he signed the final agreement ending the war in Vietnam, of which he had been one of the architects. Kissinger, who obsequiously went along with Nixon's expansion of the war with the bombing of peasant villages in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Kissinger, who matches the definition of a war criminal very accurately, was given a peace prize!
Originally Posted by wedge
Theodore Roosevelt brokered a peace between Japan and Russia. But he was a lover of war, who participated in the US conquest of Cuba, pretending to liberate it from Spain while fastening US chains around that tiny island. And as president he presided over the bloody war to subjugate the Filipinos, even congratulating a US general who had just massacred 600 helpless villagers in the Phillipines. The Committee did not give the Nobel Prize to Mark Twain, who denounced Roosevelt and criticised the war, nor to William James, leader of the anti-imperialist league.the big print giveth the small print taketh
-
12th October 2009, 23:06 #65Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
This was a man who actively advocated some appalling policies while serving two Republican presidents. I would have thought that such a person would be a subject of your typically considered admiration.
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
-
12th October 2009, 23:31 #66Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,920
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I suppose I could goggle this but didn't Kissinger's Vietnamese counter-part also get the award? Wasn't that a split award?
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I suppose peace or being a man of peace is one terms that leaves a lot of room for individual definition.If legislation makes you equal, you aren't.
-
12th October 2009, 23:56 #67Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You really should read up on T. Roosevelt. He wasn't the blood thirsty guy many histories try to portray him as. I mean really go back and read his own words. Sure it can sound a bit racist at times, but he really did have the best interests of the Cubans and Filipinos at heart.
Originally Posted by steve_spackman
But I suppose that is a bit outside of this discussion.The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
13th October 2009, 00:15 #68Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 6,410
- Like
- 0
- Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
The Vietnamese counter part refused to accept it. The peace talks and the outcome were a sham.
Originally Posted by Fiero 5.7
The world according to Taki Inoue: https://mobile.twitter.com/takiinoue/st ... 7249326080
-
13th October 2009, 05:58 #69Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,920
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most are.
Originally Posted by wedge
If legislation makes you equal, you aren't.
-
13th October 2009, 06:02 #70Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Kissinger was an appeaser and one of the creators of detente with the Soviets. He also served 2 Presidents who were in know way conservative.
Originally Posted by BDunnell


Reply With Quote
As the event is expected to be WRC round next year, I expect there will be lot of drivers also from WRC2 to see the stages.
[ERC] Rally di Roma Capitale 2026