Results 11 to 20 of 26
-
8th October 2008, 17:42 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 1,191
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So then PT not getting a ride this year must reflect poorly on the current management.
Originally Posted by downtowndeco
"For 80 years this place has run on tradition. From today forward it will run as a business." - Tony George (Failed businessman)
-
8th October 2008, 19:01 #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 1,544
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rex Monaco
Does PT have a signed contract with anyone in the IRL? How many times did CCWS or CART get sued vs how many times has the IRL ended up in court?
Say what you want, it was a a series that played fast and loose with the facts & would often throw things out there against the good will of it's fans to see if it would stick. In the end it caught up with them.
-
8th October 2008, 19:14 #13No, did PT have a signed contract with CCWS? No, he did not. He had a signed contract with Forsythe. If it was fair for you to stretch his contractual relationship with Forsythe to be an indictment of all of CCWS or CART, why is it not fair to stretch his lack of ANY contract to be an indictment of the IRL?
Originally Posted by downtowndeco
Is PT suing CCWS or CART? No, he is suing Forsythe. What does the number of suits against CCWS or CART have to do with the topic of this thread?
Originally Posted by downtowndeco
Again, as I said the other day, you are painting with too broad a brush. You are rushing to criticize all of CART or CCWS using a topic that has a MUCH narrower focus. This is about Forsythe. It is not about CCWS. It is not about CCWS. Say what YOU like, but much as you'd like this thread to be about CCWS... it isn't.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
8th October 2008, 19:41 #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 1,544
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talk about spliting hairs. Was Forsythe an owner of CCWS? Yes. When he talked Paul into staying in CCWS (because he was literally the last "name" they had) was it because it would be good for his team or good for the series, which he owned?
I'm sure there were some good guys at CCWS. But I stand by my opinion that in many cases the management played fast and loose. There are not many CCWS fans who feel very good about the bill of goods they were sold by the amigos.
Originally Posted by garyshell
-
8th October 2008, 19:47 #15
Stand by whatever you wish. I stand by the FACT that this thread and this lawsuit is about a contractual relationship with Forsythe racing. The fact that the principal in that company happened to be an owner of the series, does NOT make that series a party to the suit, nor germane to this thread.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
8th October 2008, 23:25 #16Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by downtowndeco
You all talk how one side was so much better than the other. Does an announced sellout at a race this year that was maybe 50% full stick in your memory? It does mine. After my 1st year following the IRL, the thing that strikes me most is how much more a like the 2 were than than they were different. And Tony's dung doesn't taste any better to me than the Amigo's dung.
-
9th October 2008, 00:41 #17Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 3,586
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Let's not take this topic any further but this an agreement that PT and GF made when they were in CC. An agreement that supported both parties all the way to an event that CC folds. No need to go back and argue "if" and "when" but by reading articles and looking at the results from October 2007 to October 2008, most would be on PT's side. On top of this lawsuit, there was a dispute around December last year between PT and GF about contract. Yet in the end, GF re-signed PT or something like this. Probably not expecting CC would fold soon, or CC could continue on, GF kept PT. I believe that GF keeping PT had something to do with the CC management stir ups at the time. Yet, that doesn't prove that PT shouldn't be paid for a year in service with the team.
Come on Jerry, pay the guy. At least he stood by his words.... did you?"Lawyers are the best investment"....Tom Leykis
-
9th October 2008, 17:37 #18Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 402
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I disagree, I think GF knew CC was going to shutdown and was looking for a loophole with PT. For GF to want to drop PT and break the contract or PT to take a serious pay cut, then suddenly everything is all right? I dont buy it.
Originally Posted by Cart750hp
GF has turned into, (or maybe he always has been), a child.I'm old enough that I don't have to put up with your crap anymore.
-
9th October 2008, 18:17 #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 1,544
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Again. How many times has the IRL been sued? How many times has CCWS been sued?
Originally Posted by DBell
BTW it was the track that announced the sellout, not the IRL. The IRL received it's full sanctioning fee & will be back next year, unlike San Jose/Las Vegas etc.
-
9th October 2008, 18:26 #20Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 402
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And WHAT does that have to do with PT suing Forsythe? Lets stay on topic here shall we.
Originally Posted by downtowndeco
I'm old enough that I don't have to put up with your crap anymore.


Reply With Quote
Not many were expecting Lando to lead the drivers' championship with four race remaining in the season at the summer break but here we are. It is now very much a genuine three way race for the title...
Formula 1: Articles & News...