Results 1,251 to 1,260 of 1270
Thread: What Happens Next?
-
10th September 2008, 15:27 #1251Originally Posted by Miatanut
Originally Posted by Miatanut
Originally Posted by Miatanut
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
11th September 2008, 07:26 #1252
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 300
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garyshell
1970: First Indy I saw.
1973: The disaster known as Indy 1973.
1974: 'Thanks, but no thanks'
1975: 'Thanks, but no thanks'
1976: 'Guess I'll give it another try'
Late 1980's, early 1990's: Auto racing safety articles, including engineering calculations, make regular appearances in On Track and Autoweek, both of which I subscribed to. The obvious problems of the concrete outer walls on the square oval known as IMS are a frequent topic of discussion, and largely similar solutions are proposed.
1992: Former Atlantic RotY and Atlantic Champ Jovy Marcelo killed following a hard impact with the wall at Indy. I'm appalled by Tony's quotes in print and decide I'm done with Indy forever.
Present: Haven't seen any event at Indy since 1991, and I don't care to.
Fitch criticized the initial Safer installation at IMS as one which could hook a car. I'm not convinced. Although I think he has been a great automotive safety engineer, I think this was really more about professional jealousy because they didn't use his proposal years earlier, than a real defect in the design.
In my opinion, the IMS management's practice of being behind the curve on safety, which I first noticed in the early 1970's continues to be expressed in designs like the hard gearbox end, which they then put a carbon fiber pimple on to try to provide some impact absorbtion, the cars which fly too easily, and drivers who should not be out there driving in the field. Another example is if you have some old CCWS race ads and IRL race ads. You will see the CCWS ads talk about the battle of man and machine, the gutsy drivers, etc., and many have no crash images or footage in them, and the others have very little. Then watch IRL ads from the same period, where crashes feature quite prominently in the ad. In 40 years, they haven't changed. This kind of stuff is exactly why I, and many others, have been so passionate in our opposition to IMS management's attempt to, and subsequent success at gaining control of the sport.
They are the wrong people for the job.
-
11th September 2008, 12:59 #1253
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just what did Tony say in print that ticks you off so much? I can't recall him saying anything inflammatory in any way from that accident.
As for your assertions about safety, and everything that IMS and the IRL have done in that regard and the ONGOING efforts, they're still baloney as I said before. I don't know why Fitch's design wasn't used but I DO know that no one would turn it down because they wanted more crashes and injuries.
-
12th September 2008, 17:32 #1254
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 300
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indycool
-
12th September 2008, 20:30 #1255
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, PRECISELY is what my question demands when you make such accusations and I almost certainly would remember if he said anything like you picture. Everyone would.
And PRECISELY what was Fitch's plan? For example, you said the excuse was that it would decrease the width of the track. Do you think that taking room to drive away would be safer? What amount of deceleration would take place with Fitch's plan? The current SAFER barriers were studied by safety experts and physicists and crash tests were done at the University of Nebraska for a couple years before the first generation was installed and the current version supposedly takes away about 30-35 percent of the energy. Prior to the SAFER barrier, IMS tried a "styrofoam" type substance that Luyendyk scattered all over the race track with an IROC car.
The HANS device was developed by experts from the University of Michigan and Jim Downing. It was tested and checked and is now mandatory by some sanctioning bodies.
You have made serious accusations but provided absolutely no details. The effect is an inappropriate smear campaign. Take it to CW.
-
12th September 2008, 21:01 #1256
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 300
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry, you're going to have to do better than that to get me to spend hours looking for details which you can then blow-off. I don't have the passion for American open wheel any more. Tony killed it for me.
-
12th September 2008, 21:31 #1257
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Big allegations. Great copout. I find your comments exceedingly questionable because nobody else here seems to remember them, and they're so egregious that I feel certain if the comments were made, they'd be remembered.
-
12th September 2008, 23:41 #1258
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 1,191
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indycool"For 80 years this place has run on tradition. From today forward it will run as a business." - Tony George (Failed businessman)
-
13th September 2008, 01:32 #1259
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Half right, I believe, Rex. IRL mandated the wheel tethers first, CART did the HANS first. I could be wrong.
-
13th September 2008, 05:04 #1260Originally Posted by Rex Monaco
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
I didn't want to open new thread so I decided to look for last one specifically talking about prospects. If I am not mistaken, last rally winner that wasn't Kalle Rovanpera and wasn't 30+ years...
The thread of talents