Results 1 to 10 of 1296
Thread: WRC future
Threaded View
-
2nd February 2021, 08:11 #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2019
- Posts
- 850
- Like
- 227
- Liked 592 Times in 315 Posts
sorry, nope! It's not me making Mirek sound like. Just taking what he said. Just check!
Mirek didn't just said that claim was unsupported. he claimed it's false: "I only said the Paddon's claim was false because it was unsupported".
I'm not questioning anyone's legitimate doubt for sure! on that, I completely agree with you, I'm not taking it for granted me too, I've said a lot of time "time will tell".
I'm questioning the incorrect association no proof=false.
just this, not trying to diminish Mirek's knowledge or anything. a claim not proven can be controversial as you want and generate any kind of doubt, but doesn't mean it is false.
on this basis, nothing new can be achieved. I claim I can do something, then I go experimenting. doubt are normal and logical, but it's not that is automatically wrong (false) just because it was not done before (lack of data). when they set up for the moon, no claim on going there could be proven that moment, right?
anyway: a far too long "phylosofic" discourse for a rally forum. and way off topic. let's move on, shall we?
Almost all Finn's since Paavo Nurmi who are fast in their sport have been called "Flying", particularly the 1960's rally drivers, but I was actually thinking of "Flying Finnish" - the timing line at...
What's the first thing to come to...