Page 33 of 96 FirstFirst ... 2331323334354383 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 960

Thread: 2018 Teams

  1. #321
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,317
    Like
    543
    Liked 2,262 Times in 893 Posts
    Some potentially big news in MN which impacts the driver market.

    The WRC commission are discussing whether to implement a rule which allows teams to have three points scoring cars for the manufacturer championship from a possible four nominated drivers. (Right now it's 2 from 3). Which means it will be in the interests of teams to run a fourth car.
    RS Motorsport Media - Follow me on Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia

  2. Likes: Adler (23rd August 2017),Allez Andruet (23rd August 2017),andyone (2nd September 2017),AnttiL (23rd August 2017),Fast Eddie WRC (23rd August 2017),Jewy46 (23rd August 2017),pantealex (23rd August 2017),Rally Power (23rd August 2017)
  3. #322
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    141
    Like
    32
    Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Andre Oliveira View Post
    Same news repeated several times....
    Sorry....

    Sent from my HTC Desire 10 pro using Tapatalk

  4. #323
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,008
    Like
    344
    Liked 3,898 Times in 2,036 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmi View Post
    Some potentially big news in MN which impacts the driver market.

    The WRC commission are discussing whether to implement a rule which allows teams to have three points scoring cars for the manufacturer championship from a possible four nominated drivers. (Right now it's 2 from 3). Which means it will be in the interests of teams to run a fourth car.
    That does seem as a rather drastic push that will increase costs, but obviously manufacturers can still keep running 3 cars, it also partly blocks other teams from points if all 3 finish.

    I'd first implement what Nandan suggested, that is M-nominated cars that don't score points (because they are 3rd from same team), block other M cars from these points.

    Example from Germany:
    - Evans and Lappi were M-nominated but since both were 3rd car from their team they didn't score points and didn't count in results which is why Paddon got points for 7th M-place, and Sordo for 8th

    - with "blocking" Paddon would get M-points for 8th and Sordo for 10th

    There is always also the option of allowing 4 cars to be nominated but only count 2 best places. That gives some incentive for 4th car but doesn't make it necessary.
    Last edited by mknight; 23rd August 2017 at 14:26.

  5. Likes: AnttiL (23rd August 2017)
  6. #324
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,150
    Like
    10,074
    Liked 16,130 Times in 7,004 Posts
    Matton admitted his focus was more on 2018 and organising his team for next season rather than on the next three rallies. Asked if Meeke remained part of those plans, he replied: “He has a contract and he is part of the team.”
    The final decision on Meeke’s future is, however, out of Matton’s hands. PSA Peugeot Citroen CEO Carlos Tavares will decide who drives for the Versailles team.

    https://www.motorsport-news.co.uk/ne...to-be-decided/

  7. Likes: A FONDO (25th August 2017),andyone (2nd September 2017),AnttiL (23rd August 2017),Rally Power (23rd August 2017)
  8. #325
    Senior Member jparker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,779
    Like
    265
    Liked 168 Times in 128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dimviii View Post
    Matton admitted his focus was more on 2018 and organising his team for next season rather than on the next three rallies. Asked if Meeke remained part of those plans, he replied: “He has a contract and he is part of the team.”
    The final decision on Meeke’s future is, however, out of Matton’s hands. PSA Peugeot Citroen CEO Carlos Tavares will decide who drives for the Versailles team.

    https://www.motorsport-news.co.uk/ne...to-be-decided/
    The following 3 events are very valuable as preparation for next year.

  9. Likes: racerx1979 (23rd August 2017)
  10. #326
    Senior Member racerx1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,011
    Like
    299
    Liked 784 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jparker View Post
    The following 3 events are very valuable as preparation for next year.
    Agreeg! Especially when the amount of time between Australia and Monte is around two months or less.

  11. #327
    Senior Member Rally Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,004
    Like
    3,729
    Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dimviii View Post
    Matton admitted his focus was more on 2018 and organising his team for next season rather than on the next three rallies. Asked if Meeke remained part of those plans, he replied: “He has a contract and he is part of the team.”
    The final decision on Meeke’s future is, however, out of Matton’s hands. PSA Peugeot Citroen CEO Carlos Tavares will decide who drives for the Versailles team.
    https://www.motorsport-news.co.uk/ne...to-be-decided/
    The mention to Mr. Tavares is the confirmation that drivers changes will occur. Current drivers have 2018 contracts, so there was no need for PSA CEO approval on them. His intervention is probably linked with the extra money needed to sign Ogier. Anyway, I really hope Carlos Tavares will be able to help Citroen Racing in a more active way and he won’t just decide the driver’s line up; the team management also seems to need a reform…
    Rally addict since 1982

  12. #328
    Senior Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    664
    Like
    557
    Liked 782 Times in 309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    That does seem as a rather drastic push that will increase costs, but obviously manufacturers can still keep running 3 cars, it also partly blocks other teams from points if all 3 finish.
    How would the cost of runbing another car for the whole season compare with the cost of travelling to another event like they keep complaining about?

  13. #329
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,831
    Like
    1,478
    Liked 1,837 Times in 712 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GravelBen View Post
    How would the cost of runbing another car for the whole season compare with the cost of travelling to another event like they keep complaining about?
    I don't know any actual numbers but I remember in the mid 2000s most teams were running 3 or even 4 cars for 14 rallies. Then they moved to 16 rallies and everyone complained of the cost and downgraded to 2 cars. In a way it makes sense that it's cheaper to add a car to your team since all the logistics and equipment (aside from the car, extra spares and car specific personnel) is there already but if you add a rally you have to organize the whole shebang once more.

  14. Likes: electroliquid (24th August 2017),GravelBen (25th August 2017),pantealex (24th August 2017),Rally Power (24th August 2017)
  15. #330
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,626
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,524 Times in 4,616 Posts
    http://www.wrc.com/en/wrc/news/augus...7--12-12-.html

    I’ve done many years now and it’s always becoming harder and harder to go out of home, especially when you have a kid. It’s a lot of travel, a lot of stress. I’m relaxed with this but the truth is I’m working on it to find a solution to continue.
    Does Ogier live in France? Would he be happier on Citroen with the team headquarters and most of the tests being closer to his home?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •