Page 88 of 421 FirstFirst ... 3878868788899098138188 ... LastLast
Results 871 to 880 of 4205
  1. #871
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    In Engleski wir sagen "Pratice makes Perfect"

    3 years of that on SS1 or SS2 and he learned how to flip sehr gut!
    und Sie können sagen, - wunderbar
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  2. #872
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    134
    Like
    31
    Liked 29 Times in 12 Posts
    What would be wrong with supplying the 2017 cars with the current 2016 restrictors? Manufacturers would have an outlet to sell their cars to national competitors and to be fair the cars would be no faster than they are now just with active diffs, it might even make them safer for less experienced drivers.

  3. #873
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,526
    Like
    7,836
    Liked 11,182 Times in 4,441 Posts
    Are You saying that a car with active center diff is not faster than a car without center diff at all?
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  4. #874
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    382
    Like
    470
    Liked 216 Times in 105 Posts
    I can't see how R5 experience would qualify you to drive the new WRC cars, as surely there should be a considerable gap in performance, particularly power and aero. So surely this is a flawed idea, they can't get experience in the car as they aren't allowed to drive it, and there isn't anything else that is close to it. So unless they say a current (2016) generation car is the stepping stone, I can't see how it can work?

    But then look at Lorenzo, finished events when in an R5. Went to WRC car and seems to have lost the plot?

  5. #875
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    382
    Like
    470
    Liked 216 Times in 105 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ToughMac View Post
    What would be wrong with supplying the 2017 cars with the current 2016 restrictors? Manufacturers would have an outlet to sell their cars to national competitors and to be fair the cars would be no faster than they are now just with active diffs, it might even make them safer for less experienced drivers.
    In my limited experience with production style active centre diff (ie Subaru DCCD with an aftermarket controller programmed with custom diff maps), compared to regular plate diffs, a plate diff is easier/more predictable to get used to for a newbie (ie me).

  6. #876
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,526
    Like
    7,836
    Liked 11,182 Times in 4,441 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Munkvy View Post
    In my limited experience with production style active centre diff (ie Subaru DCCD with an aftermarket controller programmed with custom diff maps), compared to regular plate diffs, a plate diff is easier/more predictable to get used to for a newbie (ie me).
    Current WRC cars don't have center diff at all. The difference of having an active one and none at all is really big. Than we have the new aero package, wider track, better brake cooling and many other small things which must make the 2017 faster even with same restrictor. Thinking only about the power like ToughMac did is wrong.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  7. Likes: leighton323 (7th May 2016)
  8. #877
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,107
    Like
    9,944
    Liked 16,104 Times in 6,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Munkvy View Post
    In my limited experience with production style active centre diff (ie Subaru DCCD with an aftermarket controller programmed with custom diff maps), compared to regular plate diffs, a plate diff is easier/more predictable to get used to for a newbie (ie me).
    quite the opposite imho. Mitsubishi evo has active center and rear diffs about 16 years back. For the average driver(and not only) active production diffs,are a big help to the driver.Thats why subaru decided to follow Mitsubishi after some years delay.
    I ve changed mabe more than 20-30 maps at my evo center active diff,and the difference is impressive.But didnt find the last excellent result, just uploading some custom maps.It requires some more try and error with your programmer to fix it for your car and drive.

  9. #878
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Halifax, UK
    Posts
    531
    Like
    169
    Liked 140 Times in 86 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Current WRC cars don't have center diff at all.
    Can you explain this to me? I don't understand how a four-wheel-drive drivetrain can function 'without a centre diff'. To me a centre diff is what apportions torque between the front and rear axles...

  10. #879
    Senior Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    664
    Like
    557
    Liked 782 Times in 309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack4688` View Post
    Can you explain this to me? I don't understand how a four-wheel-drive drivetrain can function 'without a centre diff'. To me a centre diff is what apportions torque between the front and rear axles...
    As far as I know the current WRC cars have front and rear axles effectively locked to rotate together (like a Hilux or similar when in 4wd) - a centre diff would let the front and rear rotate at different speeds (hence the word 'differential').

    If you've ever tried to take a tight turn with a locked centre diff or no centre diff 4wd you'll understand why that setup generally results in more sliding from a rally car.

  11. Likes: Jack4688` (7th May 2016)
  12. #880
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Halifax, UK
    Posts
    531
    Like
    169
    Liked 140 Times in 86 Posts
    Thanks, makes more sense now.

    So essentially that rearward shaft is just taking 50% of the torque from the front final drive back to the rear diff without anything fancy going on inside?


    Would the step between active diff and none at all be something like a Torsen or a viscous coupling then? i.e. not interfered with electronically (not in the same way a Haldex works, that would be a REactive wait-until-you're-already-understeering system), purely a mechanically PROactive system?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •