Results 1 to 10 of 29
-
16th August 2014, 09:39 #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
- Posts
- 3,230
- Like
- 1
- Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Most aesthetically pleasing unsuccessful racing car
If it looks fast, it'll be fast, according to one racing saying - but it doesn't always happen. There have been some undeniably pretty racing cars that haven't been that good so, following a couple of threads on aesthetics that still seem to be going strong, I thought I'd start one for cars that haven't really lived up to their looks.
This was partly inspired by a trip to the Beaulieu Motor Museum the other week, and seeing the McLaren MP4/9. The 1994 Peugeot-powered car actually sets the bar pretty high, since it took multiple podium finishes, including second places in Monaco and (inherited) in Belgium. But compared to McLarens of previous years it was a flop, despite a simple, neatly packaged design and that red and white livery that made almost all McLarens look good (its successor being a notable exception!).
For true lack of success, the Andrea Moda S921 has to qualify - with that menacing black livery it was certainly a looker, but only once saw a race start and didn't get much further than that. From the wider world of racing, I'd also nominate the sinister black Epsilon Euskadi EE1 - far and away more successful than the Moda, but with only one season of racing it wasn't given chance to show its potential.
Got to be plenty more than that, but that's a good-looking trio of failures (of varying degrees) for starters...https://wordpress.com/stats/insights/stugrovesf1.wordpress.com
-
30th August 2014, 22:15 #2
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 143
- Like
- 0
- Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
There was a Ligier from the late '80s which fitted the bill.
-
30th August 2014, 22:33 #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 10,568
- Like
- 695
- Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
Is it this one? It certainly is a decent looking car
I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy
- Likes: Fortitude (8th January 2022)
-
1st September 2014, 02:26 #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
- New Plymouth; New Zealand
- Posts
- 4,328
- Like
- 8
- Liked 165 Times in 131 Posts
Ligier JS17?
After this car Claude Galpin took over in the design chair and Ligiers were never again going to win beauty contests.
Most pre-Galopin Ligiers were good lookers apart from the JS5 with the wide nose and the huge air boxLast edited by anfield5; 1st September 2014 at 02:30.
- Likes: Fortitude (8th January 2022)
-
1st September 2014, 15:17 #5
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
The BMW M1 was brilliant but rubbish. I don't know if it ever actually achieved any of it purposes but it looked stunning; even in BASF livery.The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
-
9th September 2014, 03:57 #6
The Hendrick Motorsports Corvette GTP from the IMSA GT series. Maybe its just the paint job, but I always felt this car looked good. Way better than the Corvette Daytona Prototypes of today. It did manage two wins in 1986 at Road Atlanta and Palm beach, both driven by Doc Bundy and Sarel van der Merwe, but otherwise rarely finished in the top five, and regularly failed to finish at all. With just two wins between 1985 and 1989 (with full factory support from Chevrolet until 1988) I think its fair to say the car was pretty unsuccessful.
Last edited by pcal226; 10th September 2014 at 01:17.
Phil Hill - 1961
Mario Andretti -1978
-
12th September 2014, 23:51 #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Old Trafford
- Posts
- 6,991
- Like
- 23
- Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Pretty for a touring car. The 406 never scored a win in the BTCC.
Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!
- Likes: journeyman racer (19th November 2017)
-
19th November 2015, 02:51 #8
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Location
- McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
- Posts
- 414
- Like
- 36
- Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
Well post #1 and maybe not exactly what you're looking for but I think I would say Frank Lockhart's V-16 Stutz Black Hawk Special LSR car.
Last edited by Stan Reid; 4th December 2015 at 22:59.
-
2nd January 2016, 01:26 #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Monitored by NSA
- Posts
- 2,968
- Like
- 32
- Liked 39 Times in 33 Posts
I thought the 1974 F1 Shadow DN - 3 was appealing for a mysteriously unsuccessful ride.
http://www.fantasyjunction.com/cars/...Cosworth%20DFV
Their Can-Am racers were pretty bad ass looking too. Especially formatted in the same livery.Last edited by AAReagles; 2nd January 2016 at 01:34.
-
2nd January 2016, 13:38 #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 6,744
- Like
- 145
- Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
Some of the Minardis were pretty good-looking, even though needless to say they were backmarkers.
I also liked the 2007 Spyker, and 2004 Jordan - both at the back of the field.
I liked the Lotus (Fernandes' new team) of 2010 as well.
Okay, I can carry on... In short: I have liked lots of backmarker cars. Certainly they qualify for "unsuccessful" in terms of raw results, but not in terms of aestethics!
Almost all Finn's since Paavo Nurmi who are fast in their sport have been called "Flying", particularly the 1960's rally drivers, but I was actually thinking of "Flying Finnish" - the timing line at...
What's the first thing to come to...