Results 1 to 10 of 119
Threaded View
-
20th December 2011, 20:20 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- Posts
- 5,675
- Like
- 6
- Liked 47 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by BDunnell"I" before "E" except after "C". Weird.
My wider point was that BR's "efficiency" at the time was completley unsustainable, modernisation, renewals and maintenance were put off, requiring less funding and obviously also causing less disruption, meaning a short term increase in performance. That efficiency and decreasing subsidy, i beleive, would and could not have continued, as the investment had to be made sooner or later, and by it coming later it has probably cost more in the long term, as what could have been maintained had to be replaced. There was no way the infrastructure at privatisation could have taken the traffic or performed the journey times, now available. The downside is that investment means work being carried out, which causes disruption and reflects badly on the networks performance short termOriginally Posted by BDunnell
"I" before "E" except after "C". Weird.
F1 - 2024 Canadian Grand Prix - Friday Press Conference Transcript. TEAM REPRESENTATIVES: Mike KRACK (Aston Martin), Andrea STELLA (McLaren), Ayao KOMATSU (Haas), James VOWLES (Williams) FIA (Press...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...