Quote Originally Posted by tommeke_B View Post
Maybe you should read the stewards decision. After the finish, at the stop-line, Latvala told Julian Porter that he hit a spectator (before anyone else talked about it). So he knew about it, no need to discuss about it.
yes I read it, thanks. There are lot of arguments one of which is the steam/mud visibility, there is also Latvala's statement he didn't see much and was looking to get back on the road. That one I'm discussing, why the stewards consider this as evidence, if only the one You mention is enough. There is lot of uncertainty about this. But no need to discuss it indeed, just mention it to consider evidence of something which can't be considered as such.