Results 1 to 10 of 15
-
14th December 2007, 10:28 #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,000
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Active Diffs - Where's the loss of performance?
Was just looking back at some of the stage times for rallies from 04-07 and there has been next to no change in the winning times over the same stages.
If active diffs were so great how come their loss has had minimal impact on speeds?
I realise there have been advances in some other areas in the meantime, but there wasn't even a huge drop off in speed in the year right after they were banned.wrc.smugmug.com
-
14th December 2007, 10:37 #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I can't say as I don't know but remember how Loeb was going to fall from the top because he wasn't able to drive without active diffs
Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
14th December 2007, 10:41 #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Posts
- 11,751
- Like
- 472
- Liked 578 Times in 210 Posts
I'm probably wrong but wasn't it only active centre diffs that were banned? So ront/rear still are?
If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off!
-
14th December 2007, 10:42 #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by J4MIE
*Edit* yup it is
http://www.rte.ie/sport/motorsport/2...ringwheel.htmlRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
14th December 2007, 10:43 #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,000
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ha yeah he's really struggled since then!
wrc.smugmug.com
-
14th December 2007, 14:01 #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,349
- Like
- 205
- Liked 657 Times in 352 Posts
Basically the same performance is available from passive diffs. Active diffs just make testing much easier as those can be re-adjusted in a fraction of the time required by passive mechanical units. The performance gain on actual stages is dependent on how well the initial diff setup suits to the stage and road conditions plus active units can be adjusted on the fly. Theoretically, active car should have some performance advantage but praxis might prove that advantage to be very small.
-
14th December 2007, 14:33 #7Originally Posted by DanielThe emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!
-
14th December 2007, 17:46 #8
If I remember right, David Lapworth said in an interview that the active diffs are about 0,1 s / km faster than mechanical diffs. Not much but 0,1 * 350 km = 35 s.
“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
15th December 2007, 08:10 #9
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,000
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
With all due respect to Lapworth's much greater knowledge of these things, the timesheets aren't backing up his claims!
wrc.smugmug.com
-
15th December 2007, 08:52 #10
he was probably right.. but improvements in tyres, handling and power would mean that disadvantage was negated.
http://gallery.dingardo.geek.nz/ - Rally Photos
Turbine blade.
What's the first thing to come to...