Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    785
    Like
    31
    Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts

    WRC - Safety Upgrades

    MJW pointed out these pictures, from the 1000 Lakes Shakedown:
    http://www.rally-live.com/wrc/en/pho..._shak_03.shtml

    http://www.rally-live.com/wrc/en/pho...iapo_056.shtml

    http://www.rally-live.com/wrc/en/pho...iapo_057.shtml

    http://www.rally-live.com/wrc/en/pho...iapo_058.shtml

    Anyone seen anything more on this.

    It looks like improved cockpit protection, but it looks like half measures. I could be wrong, but there doesn't appear to be any crash aborbing structures.

    The FIA have been asleep at the wheel for along time, as far as WRC safety is concerned, I hope they wake up soon.

    The FIA Institute CLOSED CAR RESEARCH GROUP is supposed to be working improving WRC safety, but are wheels turning at all?
    'Heroes don't die, they just move on to the next stage.' CMac Forever

  2. #2
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,437
    Like
    2,067
    Liked 1,403 Times in 726 Posts
    With basis in Řsberg/Barth accident, does FIA need to revisit the safety issues, with focus on side impact?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,224
    Like
    1
    Liked 1,227 Times in 664 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    With basis in Řsberg/Barth accident, does FIA need to revisit the safety issues, with focus on side impact?
    The only thing you could do is make the cars wider so there's room for a crumble zone. And that could actually be done pretty easily, since the cars are already wider at the wheels.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,621
    Like
    11
    Liked 750 Times in 370 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    With basis in Řsberg/Barth accident, does FIA need to revisit the safety issues, with focus on side impact?
    I don't think there was anything particularly remarkable about that accident that needs changes to cars.

  5. Likes: J4MIE (29th July 2024),Morte66 (29th July 2024)
  6. #5
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,550
    Like
    3,612
    Liked 9,888 Times in 5,315 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    The only thing you could do is make the cars wider so there's room for a crumble zone. And that could actually be done pretty easily, since the cars are already wider at the wheels.
    You mean make fatter doors that are as wide as the wheel arches ? A nice idea, but all these cars would need these fitted retrospectively and the costs may be significant.

    The Rally1 cars already have thicker side protection so they should be ok, as several big crashes have proved.

    https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/why-r...y-to-wrc-cars/

  7. #6
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,550
    Like
    3,612
    Liked 9,888 Times in 5,315 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    I don't think there was anything particularly remarkable about that accident that needs changes to cars.
    Occupants of much more severe crashes have walked away uninjured, but the effect of this 'unremarkable' side-impact was pretty bad (co-driver unconscious, bleeding with broken jaw and hip)...

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,363
    Like
    625
    Liked 696 Times in 389 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Occupants of much more severe crashes have walked away uninjured, but the effect of this 'unremarkable' side-impact was pretty bad (co-driver unconscious, bleeding with broken jaw and hip)...
    Is there evidence to suggest more door material will prevent that? When the driver also broke a rib, perhaps it's something else can be improved related to lateral impacts? Seats, harnesses etc.

  9. #8
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Occupants of much more severe crashes have walked away uninjured, but the effect of this 'unremarkable' side-impact was pretty bad (co-driver unconscious, bleeding with broken jaw and hip)...
    20 years ago this accident would likely end being fatal. A lot was done even though it is not that visible.

    As denkimi said the only major thing you can do is to add width at the door area but that is not possible within Rally2 rules using stock bodyshell and door. You can therefore either go full Rally 1 (it's not only about the door depth but also the crew in the Rally 1 sits closer to each other) or you can somewhat help by using special prototype door on the Rally 2 bodyshells. It is most likely doable but It will be expensive and I don't think anyone wants to bring very expensive solutions to the customer-oriented Rally 2.
    Last edited by Mirek; 29th July 2024 at 17:36.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  10. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    8
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    This looks like a very dangerous crash to me. The car is traveling at decent speed when it hits an immovable object directly where someone is sitting. That's a huge amount of force in a concentrated area in a sudden impact.

    Don't be fooled by crashes that "look big" but actually don't result in big forces on the occupants. For example, a car that goes off the road at 120kmh, and rolls ten times, before finally coming to a stop 400m away in a field. Looks big, but all that energy is dissipated gradually over time as the car slows down during the crash. Much less dangerous.

  11. Likes: J4MIE (30th July 2024)
  12. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    979
    Like
    732
    Liked 472 Times in 262 Posts
    The 17 cars had a pretty neat solution already, that could be doable for Rally2 with reasonable cost I would guess. But probably something for a future regulation change not as a add on for now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •