Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    607
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
    Here's how they do it. Teams run the softest springs possible to lower the cars ride hight while moving. Over the course of the race, stress and fatigue lowers the spring rate, thus lowering the static ride height.

    I don't think static point penalties are good for punishing post race violations. I would just use the F1 method and give them a 25 second time penalty.
    I have a problem with that if it's something that the teams couldn't do anything about it, but if it's an obvious attempt at cheating then that'll do fine.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,406
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Well think about it this way. Lowering the ride height during the race was the team's goal. Getting caught wasn't.
    racing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
    9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    14,547
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    I think they have to do something. Putting in springs that would settle may have been calculated, not a case of overt cheating, but cheating with plausable denial.

    I think they wont be as harsh as the penalties to the 24 and 48 were, but they wont be light either. The Hendrick teams now have all been caught in something except the 25. Hendrick will have to be careful...
    "Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".

  4. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    43 cars in the field, 41 managed to keep their cars above the minimum height at the end of the race and 2 didn't.

    Of course getting the car lower helps, and if those two cars were at the same height as the others, maybe, just maybe they might have not finished where they did. The teams all know the minimum height, and are aware that it might be checked at the end of the race, so really there should be no question.

    We are all led to believe how much technology/personnel/money these teams have, therefore they should be using those resources to make sure they do not fail tech on a simple point, or of course maybe they failed on purpose to try to avoid NASCAR checking something else, who knows....
    racingviews.com My Views, My Opinions :smokin:

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Poconos PA
    Posts
    8,800
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The #7 car was also pulled for inspection after the race and it passed.
    "You win some, lose some, and wreck some." - Dale Earnhardt

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    6,343
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by muggle not
    Expect something like a 25 point penalty, maybe, or maybe no points.
    From Jayski

    UPDATE 2: NASCAR has issued penalties and fines to the #5 and #70 teams that compete in the Nextel Cup Series, as a result of rule infractions found this past weekend at New Hampshire International Speedway in Loudon, N.H. Both cars – the #5 Chevy driven by Kyle Busch and the #70 Chevy driven by Johnny Sauter – were found to be in violation of Sections 12-4-A (actions detrimental to stock car racing); 12-4-Q (car, car parts, components and/or equipment used do not conform to NASCAR rules); and 20-12.8.1B, COT Technical Bulletin #3, dated 4/10/07 (failed to meet the minimum front car heights) of the 2007 NASCAR rule book. The violations were found during post-race inspection last Sunday. As a result, Kyle Busch and Sauter have each been penalized 25 driver championship points. Their respective crew chiefs – Alan Gustafson and Robert “Bootie” Barker – have each been fined $25,000 and placed on probation until Sept. 19. In addition, Rick Hendrick, owner of the #5, has been penalized 25 car owner championship points as has Joe Custer, the owner of the #70.(NASCAR PR)(7-4-2007
    __________________
    "If you can help others, and fail to do so, your time on earth has been wasted" - Roberto Clemente

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB, Canada
    Posts
    585
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I suppose this must have been ruled a part malfuntion.
    SKOL VIKINGS!

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    203
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by muggle not
    From Jayski

    UPDATE 2: NASCAR has issued penalties and fines to the #5 and #70 teams that compete in the Nextel Cup Series, as a result of rule infractions found this past weekend at New Hampshire International Speedway in Loudon, N.H. Both cars – the #5 Chevy driven by Kyle Busch and the #70 Chevy driven by Johnny Sauter – were found to be in violation of Sections 12-4-A (actions detrimental to stock car racing); 12-4-Q (car, car parts, components and/or equipment used do not conform to NASCAR rules); and 20-12.8.1B, COT Technical Bulletin #3, dated 4/10/07 (failed to meet the minimum front car heights) of the 2007 NASCAR rule book. The violations were found during post-race inspection last Sunday. As a result, Kyle Busch and Sauter have each been penalized 25 driver championship points. Their respective crew chiefs – Alan Gustafson and Robert “Bootie” Barker – have each been fined $25,000 and placed on probation until Sept. 19. In addition, Rick Hendrick, owner of the #5, has been penalized 25 car owner championship points as has Joe Custer, the owner of the #70.(NASCAR PR)(7-4-2007
    __________________

    This is a crock. Like Harvick said it should be 100 points 100k and 6 weeks. Also start at the back of the pack for the next race like the 24&48 had to. This was a race infraction not just a test run.
    Don't take anything I post too seriously folks.
    I'm like a bottle of wine, I get better with age.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    402
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    In my mind (I'm not an avid NASCAR fan, but like to try to keep up to date with all the results and everything throughout the year), the car was run illegally in this race, so firstly they should not score any points or prize money or anything from this race. I don't know exactly what their points haul etc would have been from this race but they should definatly loose that first up.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Posts
    5,927
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Whhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa . . . . . sniff . . . . sniff
    DVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •