Results 31 to 40 of 106
-
31st December 2006, 05:25 #31
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Oval wings and some mods are NOT rocket science people. The engineers that design race cars know all about what they are doing, and an oval just demands less downforce to make the racing interesting on ovals and force drivers to lay off the throttle instead of going flat out. That is something the IRL cars need to look at right now. I find most of their cookie cutter oval races are pretty much flat to the floor exercises, and that isn't racing people. That is just playing around in the draft like a NASCAR superspeedway event. IT is fun once in a while, but when half your races are packs, it just is a dangerous way to make a living, and I find it often dull after a while. The best races are on flat ovals... like Indy.
"Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
31st December 2006, 20:40 #32
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 4,063
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indycool
Champ Car elected to incorporate oval-specific design requirements since ovals are still part of their forecasted future. If TG ever gets his head out of the sand, you never know what technology becomes common ground. The mere fact CC has at least one chassis positioned to fit the need of both series bodes well for the furture of open wheel in North America.
The most sensible approach for the IRL would be to develop a 2nd choice along the lines of the Lola. Hopefully they will set-up shop in the US so they can keep the costs down. The UK£ is killing the US$ right now in currency exchange.LBGP: The Sound - The Spectacle. Racin' at its finest.
-
31st December 2006, 20:53 #33
All you have to do is look at the new tubs to know they are oval safe and oval ready. The oval package may not be available but you can bet they've been tested via CAE simulation just like they do in aerospace and Formula 1.
-
31st December 2006, 22:12 #34
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Guess if it ever gets necessary, we'll find out.
-
2nd January 2007, 04:43 #35
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 448
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indycool
There is absolutely nothing about the DP-01 that would make it unsuitable for oval racing, except the wishful thinking of the IRL fans that wish it, and Champ Car, would go away.
-
2nd January 2007, 12:39 #36
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IYO.
-
2nd January 2007, 14:23 #37
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 448
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not at all. Despite all of the actual facts regarding the design of the DP-01, you and your ilk insist on trying to portray it as somehow unsuitable for ovals, without a scintilla of evidence to support such claims.
-
2nd January 2007, 18:43 #38
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 2,086
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And it is true that the IRL had originally planned to have a new chassis for '06. You know that, IC.
-
2nd January 2007, 19:31 #39
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 8,384
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, Zzs, you're right. They did. Think it was the ongoing development of the car for road course kit and safety features plus cost, that probably they made an "ain't-broke-don't-fix-it" call.
-
2nd January 2007, 21:48 #40
We can be sure team owners weighed in with their opinions. Wasn't it IC that suggested CC team owners were taking a big risk investing in new chassis' when the series was on life support? I think that applies to anyone in US open wheel these days no matter where you place your allegiance.
He only destroyed 2 tyres. I dont think the other 2 softs are too bad after being driven for 17km total
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...