eWRC.com

[Myrvold]

Have anyone here subscribed with any of the options?

Nope.

[bwallace]

Have anyone here subscribed with any of the options?

nop

[Norm75]

no

Autism. Repeating the same shit over and over to the point of fanaticism. It is a trait you seem to display, have you thought about being tested for it.

Edit: before anyone gets their knickers in a twist about my comment, I am autistic. You crack on NOT, I don’t give a fuck but it makes you sound like a bell end.

[MartinH3000]

no

Oh…. What’s it like to be a miserable asshole? It must be cool to be you.

[Kenneth]

I honestly don't get that subscription model... Like 95 % of user have no use for the 8€ premium features. On top of that, no ad is 7 more euro. It doesn't make sense to me, I think that opposite would be better. I'm sure that there is a lot of users who would subscribe for like 5€ just to get no ads. Even 8€ would be ok. But 15 € for no ad and bunch of features that most of people don't need?

Idk, maybe eWRC guys did their research, but it doesn't make much sense to me.

[the sniper]

I imagine the idea is that they were looking to mainly charge the user base who are making business use of eWRC, such as those who buy and sell cars. There are relatively few of those though, so the charge is relatively high and but those types could easily afford it, while leaving the majority of the site free for the vast majority of the audience. If they're planning on getting a lot of subscribers, their strategy looks to be off though.

Whatever the intention, eWRC has always has seemed to struggle with communicating its position with its audience, it normally feels like some nuance is missing in its messaging, like something is lost in translation.