Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    7,375
    Like
    21
    Liked 279 Times in 233 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    I don't think it would make any difference at all to Joe Supermarket out there in TV land.



    I know.

    Hyperbole is always the art of the incredulous in search of where the boundary lies.
    I know Joe Supermarket , and when he smells blood , he's on the edge of his couch .

    And , just to be clear , I knew you knew .
    Hyperbole is so overrated .

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,569
    Like
    3
    Liked 72 Times in 61 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
    This thing will stop 17% of flying objects hitting the driver , apparently .
    Thus , we can extrapolate that these objects will still hit the driver 83% of the time .

    Is that good enough , or is just good enough to say that they did something ?

    Does it leave them with more than 83% of their vision ?

    It doesn't seem 17% safer at all .
    I keep telling you all. The only safe thing is no driver. Second place, put a roof on the cars and doors to get in and out. OH, wait....we already have that. It's just called something else.
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,131
    Like
    50
    Liked 220 Times in 165 Posts
    I disagree 100% with Halo. Drivers take their lives into their own hands and accept the potential consequences of taking part in open seater competition. This is why it is referred to as open seater. Halo is unnecessary and ugly. The cars are safe enough nowadays. We can never eliminate risk entirely.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,446
    Like
    14
    Liked 175 Times in 133 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
    I know Joe Supermarket , and when he smells blood , he's on the edge of his couch .
    Sounds painful.

    I think that there's a topical cream for that.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    7,375
    Like
    21
    Liked 279 Times in 233 Posts
    Concerns over how long it takes to exit the car with the halo in place are apparently being addressed by extending the allowed time from 5 seconds to 8-10 seconds .

    That sounds safe .

  6. #26
    Senior Member mr_swiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Surf City USA
    Posts
    831
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
    Concerns over how long it takes to exit the car with the halo in place are apparently being addressed by extending the allowed time from 5 seconds to 8-10 seconds .

    That sounds safe .
    Great solution.

    "Did you hear, the water is now safe to drink again"
    "Oh really ? it's about time, so they finally fixed the problem?"
    "Hell no, they decreased the safe limit"
    "Wives live longer than husbands, because they are not married to women" Colin Mochrie - "Whose Line is it anyway?" - The funniest TV show on earth!

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    7,375
    Like
    21
    Liked 279 Times in 233 Posts
    So , it's supposed to stop 17% of large flying objects .

    Tethers have made loosed tires a thing of the past , so , aren't most large items going to be carbon fiber ?
    And so , isn't this device going to shred the piece , deflecting the portion below it into the driver ?

    It's said to be able to withstand 15 times the weight of an F1 car .
    Is it going to be removable for driver extraction in case of an incident ?

    Will it become an aerodynamic device ?

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    5,068
    Like
    219
    Liked 145 Times in 109 Posts
    Not impressed. It's a measure made claiming to be for safety, and seems to be of little use.

    I'm sure if the rules allow it will be turned in to an aerodynamic device, and possibly impede the drivers getting out of the car as quickly as the new relaxed rule allows.

    There had to be a better solution.

    I'm never opposed to safety, regardless of what the drivers get paid or their level of comfort (or lack of) in safety aspects. I just think if the sporting body wants to make changes, they should be well thought out changes that don't cause another problem.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I'm sure they're main consern isnt the looks of it, but the safety. So i dont complain.
    Once you race the ghost of speed will haunt you forever! And that is fine with me

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Gran Canaria
    Posts
    1,284
    Like
    225
    Liked 127 Times in 90 Posts
    Autosport published a very good article on the halo's safety features. Here it is: http://www.autosport.com/news/report...-device-busted

    Key points:

    - When looking at possible accidents (flying debris, car-to-car accidents, etc.), the outcome is overwhelmingly positive.
    - Visibility does no longer seem to be a concern with drivers (other than with start lights, anyway).
    - Car extraction isn't more complicated for marshals.
    - If a car ends up upside down, the halo gives more space to the driver.
    - If it deforms, it can be easily cut to release the driver.
    - They expect designs to become more pleasant and better fitting with car liveries.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •