Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
Why such a crazy amount of grain on some of the pics? Underexposed?
Nope - some of the grain is due to iso800 film, some due to the neg scanning resolution and some to deliberate selective highlighting by post-ed 'sharpening'. I quite like the grainiest Tanak shot. People are too used to seeing DSLR so grain comes as a shock. I'm a product of the 60s / 70s in terms of my motorsport experience so I like the retro style of photography that was in vogue then.
Not a single pic on 2 rolls was underexposed, a Pentax and Sardinian light is a very good combination.