Results 11 to 12 of 12
28th January 2017, 17:37 #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Liked 239 Times in 204 Posts
Egos too big will too often disrupt the balance , and before this , a team could easily mitigate this issue with no protest over a team mate clash .
Now , with potential to be held responsible in all incidents , not just ones with other teams , drivers will be pressured more to behave better with their team mates .
And , sure , stewarding can be dreadfully inconsistent , but , if at least all the incidents that they see can be investigated , then it at least has a chance to be fair .
In that Canadian GP example , it could have changed the scenario completely , had Lewis been handed a penalty .
But , by the same token , he's not stupid , and would likely know his chances of getting any penalty would be greatly reduced whilst fighting his team mate , so the risk was worth the personal reward , even if the team suffers as a result .
But , not now .
- Likes: journeyman racer (2nd March 2017)
14th February 2017, 22:30 #12
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
- Liked 557 Times in 435 Posts
Glad to hear this. I hope it becomes a statement of intent to change the way F1 is run and managed on track and at race weekends. Next after Bernie is to ask Charlie to step aside.Its not crashing it's drifting with style
- Likes: Tazio (15th February 2017)