Page 14 of 136 FirstFirst ... 412131415162464114 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 1358
  1. #131
    Senior Member Gregor-y's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,041
    Like
    281
    Liked 140 Times in 81 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    What do you think happened?
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y View Post
    As for why I suspect it was Prodrive's branching out - particularly a plan for an F1 team - that took away resources from the WRC program..
    The 06 Focus was new, and the Xsara was still a proven winner so yes, designs improve. But the Impreza specifically got worse, and that was relative to its own earlier performance. Rather than blame a consistent factor like the motor why not consider what changed? And now we've both mentioned Prodrive's operations as being a cause.

    Sorry this thread seems to be getting walled off from Mexico by a couple of Americans...
    Last edited by Gregor-y; 24th February 2017 at 15:21.

  2. Likes: janvanvurpa (26th February 2017)
  3. #132
    Senior Member rayh_mx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    242
    Like
    44
    Liked 56 Times in 34 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y View Post
    Sorry this thread seems to be getting walled off from Mexico by a couple of Americans...
    Jajaja...
    Jesus Christ, Kris!!! (Not again)

  4. #133
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    I had a memory that the problems for Subaru started when the cars width was increased from 1770 mm to 1800 mm but that was already from the beginning of 2005 (http://juwra.com/rules_2005.html). But the Subaru 2006 season is documented so just watch and judge yourselves what was the reason.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...d+Rally+-+Part+
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  5. Likes: Rally Power (26th February 2017)
  6. #134
    Senior Member Lundefaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    658
    Like
    332
    Liked 887 Times in 277 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GravelBen View Post
    I always got the impression they found it increasingly hard to be competitive as WRC moved further away from production base - like the aspects fo the car that were positives for production based rallying became limitations under the WRC rules, while other platforms (Citroen etc) were able to make better use of the freedom in WRC rules.

    It seemed like Subaru as a company were less interested in non-production based rallying too, but maybe that was a result of not being so competitive there while still being a dominant force in Group-N.
    Regarding the Prodrive Subaru lack of performance, it has been discussed here before, but its multilayered:

    At the introduction of the WRC rules, Prodrive was definitely the company that pushed the boundaries. And from the start they had to work around the fact that the engine hung in front of the front axle.
    But Prodrive Engineers - lead by David Lapworth - was a clever bunch, and they where in front of the other rally teams in most areas.
    As an example, in 2003 Prodrive launched an active suspension, this was an answer to Peugeots active roll bar.
    But as the WRC class progressed, there was introduced a larger number of limitations in the regulations, and Prodrive struggled to out-engineer the deficits in regards to car size, engine placing, bore etc. And the others got better.
    On top of that there was a tire war.
    Michelin introduced their "super tire", I think in 2005? And Pirelli was left for dead.
    But Prodrive also made som tactical mistakes. David Richards dreamt of F1, and hired a lot of circuit engineers. In 2005 Prodrive introduced a car that had the rear wing fall of because the mounts wasnt "fit for rally." They had to slow down in water splashes because the car wasnt "fit for rally", and they had to run som extreme rake to get the car to steer, prob because of failing geometry. The BOS suspension was also a prob, but here I have heard unconfirmed rumours that the failing development was because they wern´t paid sufficiently by Prodrive.
    On top of that the active front and rear diff was banned. And then came the S14....
    The S14 has some major design flaws, both in geometry, but also around braking. Some one with better engineering capabilities than me can explain this better, but I think the Pedal box also was a structural integral part. Anyway, there was no feeling with the brakes (I remember talking to Petter after he first tested the S14, and he was would I would describe as in a state of panic, this was mainly because there was big problems in braking with no feeling.)
    Had Prodrive/Subaru been competitive Subaru would never have pulled out, but their failing performance and their struggling star that was once "Mr. Hollywood", but became more and more negative, lead to them using the financial crisis of 2008 as an excuse.

    Prodrive then countered with what I would say was an effort to cleance them selves of all charges (and maybe sell of the rest of the cars) by entering Marcus Grönholm in the 2009 Rally Portugal - on Öhlins suspension. He set some competitive times, but could not match his earlier stage winning speed, (second and third, second, 4th, 5th, 10th) and crashed out on SS8.

    Prodrive/Subaru was a great chapter in the history of the WRC, but unfortunately it would all come to a bitter end.
    https://www.facebook.com/noseendfirst?ref=hl#

  7. Likes: abxyz (26th February 2017),Adler (26th February 2017),Augury (26th February 2017),aykutbilir (26th February 2017),cali (26th February 2017),dimviii (26th February 2017),er88 (27th February 2017),GravelBen (26th February 2017),Gregor-y (26th February 2017),Mirek (26th February 2017),pantealex (27th February 2017),Rally Power (26th February 2017),Rallyper (26th February 2017),TWRC (26th February 2017),Walach (26th February 2017)
  8. #135
    Senior Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    664
    Like
    557
    Liked 782 Times in 309 Posts
    With regards to engine location though - the production versions of the Xsara and Focus etc also had the engine hung out in front of the front axle, but the rules obviously permitted the engine to be moved in a way that was possible with their transverse engine but not the Subarus longitudinal engine?

  9. #136
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,833
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    I think that in WRC it was only angled backwards. Anyway with the transverse I4 engines it's a lot better because the engines are way shorter in X vehicle axis (in X dimension it's two cylinders with very large bore for boxer instead of just one with small bore for I4) and are placed partially upon the front axle while the boxer is long and sits all in front of the axle. The center of gravity of the transversal I4 is a lot closer to the front axle than of the boxer. With regards to the overall inertia of the vehicle it's good to remind that it grows with the square of distance from the rotation point therefore the distance is more important than the weight itself.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  10. Likes: Lundefaret (26th February 2017)
  11. #137
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    The reason I mentioned Subaru in the first place was the clear parallel to where Citroen seems to be atm (yes, based on only 2 rounds). Got quite a déjà vu feeling over the whole thing.

    - top team slowly getting worse (Subaru with titles in 2001 and 2003, Citroen with titles up to 2012). First being slower than one car then the other (Subaru slower than Citroen, then slower than Ford; Citroen slower than VW then slower than Hyundai?)

    - main driver inconsistent possible due to overdriving the car (Solberg / Meek)

    - introduce a new car for catching up and that car does not deliver (S14 /C3 (so far))

    => Leave WRC when first "excuse" is available?

  12. #138
    Senior Member EstWRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    13,968
    Like
    6,797
    Liked 12,211 Times in 5,243 Posts
    so, rally mexico? yeah.....
    #8 Ott Tänak - Martin Järveoja #8
    - World Rally Champions 2019 -

  13. #139
    Senior Member Gregor-y's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,041
    Like
    281
    Liked 140 Times in 81 Posts
    It's coming, don't worry.

  14. #140
    Senior Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    664
    Like
    557
    Liked 782 Times in 309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EstWRC View Post
    so, rally mexico? yeah.....
    This is what happens the thread is started so long before the rally and there is nothing else to talk about!


  15. Likes: Rallyper (27th February 2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •