Page 13 of 136 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363113 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 1358
  1. #121
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,344
    Like
    5,447
    Liked 846 Times in 407 Posts
    So... Who thinks Latvala might struggle on day one? As a massive fanboy I really hope he'll maintain a steady pace through his road sweeping day and then bounce back.

    Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  2. #122
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,540
    Like
    368
    Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
    My sixth sense tells me that this year Ogier is going to have a hard time making it five in a row...
    Latvala is the real menace.
    Ogier knows why!

  3. Likes: steve.mandzij (24th February 2017)
  4. #123
    Senior Member Gregor-y's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,041
    Like
    281
    Liked 140 Times in 81 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steve.mandzij View Post
    What happened to Subaru in 08? I'd'nt followed the WRC between 2004-2010 pretty much.
    Prodrive hit some kind of wall incompetence in 2006 and the Impreza could never compete. I'm surprised Subaru took so long to stop the program and allowed them to build a new car for 2008. As for why I suspect it was Prodrive's branching out - particularly a plan for an F1 team - that took away resources from the WRC program.

    It sounds like Suzuki's WRC program was dead before the season started and it was like a zombie out there, literally and figuratively.

  5. #124
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y View Post
    Prodrive hit some kind of wall incompetence in 2006 and the Impreza could never compete. I'm surprised Subaru took so long to stop the program and allowed them to build a new car for 2008. As for why I suspect it was Prodrive's branching out - particularly a plan for an F1 team - that took away resources from the WRC program.

    It sounds like Suzuki's WRC program was dead before the season started and it was like a zombie out there, literally and figuratively.

    I think considering what they had to work with, they worked miracles..
    Look


    You know what sits in front of that bellhousing?

    ALL of this:


    When was the last time a car hanging the entire engine waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out 100% in front of the front wheel centerline did anything in WRC?

    15-16 years prior.

    And everybody else was leaning theirs back so the weight was directly over the spindles, much closer in, reducing polar moment by a metric shit-ton..

    The other thing was the engine itself.. You know what the bore was?
    And what EVERYBODY else had for bore?
    Does the words "flame front propagation" make you raise one eyebrow??

    I think there is the problem and there was no way around those 2 huge problems...

    A little late but you know what their new FJ or whatever they call the new thing has for bore?
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  6. Likes: cali (24th February 2017),smokingjoe (25th February 2017)
  7. #125
    Senior Member Gregor-y's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,041
    Like
    281
    Liked 140 Times in 81 Posts
    That doesn't explain what happened to the program in 06, though. Plus it's not a terribly large motor to hang ahead of the front axle.

  8. #126
    Senior Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    664
    Like
    557
    Liked 782 Times in 309 Posts
    I always got the impression they found it increasingly hard to be competitive as WRC moved further away from production base - like the aspects fo the car that were positives for production based rallying became limitations under the WRC rules, while other platforms (Citroen etc) were able to make better use of the freedom in WRC rules.

    It seemed like Subaru as a company were less interested in non-production based rallying too, but maybe that was a result of not being so competitive there while still being a dominant force in Group-N.

  9. Likes: jparker (24th February 2017)
  10. #127
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y View Post
    That doesn't explain what happened to the program in 06, though. Plus it's not a terribly large motor to hang ahead of the front axle.
    I'm suggesting that everybody else just had everything else nailed. You know in WRC we see speed differences often less than 0,5% between winner and 2-3-4th...If everybody else has their weight and F?R balance more of less the same---you look for anomalies.. That engine--and they aren't that light---relative to what the others are using---for example Ford's 2,0 Duratec is lighter-- and its bore size---you din't even respond to those questions (sniff)----are 2 things which are WAY different...and I don't think it takes a lot of imagination to sorta zero in on what is drastically different and at least wonder what role those anomalies have in the demise.

    Additionally I believe Prodrive internally was getting awfully big head and I've read interviews where their chief engineer was saying in essence "The cars are far to complex now for mere bumpkin drivers are able to understand anything..I know what is needed so they must just shut up and drive because they don't understand"

    What do you think happened?
    Last edited by janvanvurpa; 28th February 2017 at 22:56.
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  11. Likes: cali (24th February 2017)
  12. #128
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,116
    Like
    5,645
    Liked 2,839 Times in 1,612 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    I'm suggesting that everybody else just had everything else nailed. You know in WRC we see speed differences often less than 0,5% between winner and 2-3-4th...If everybody else has their weight and F?R balance more of less the same---you look for anomalies.. That engine--and they aren't that light---relative to what the others are using---for example Ford's 2,0 Duratec is lighter-- and its bore size---you din't even respond to those questions (sniff)----are 2 things which are WAY different...and I don't think it takes a lot of imagination to sorta zero in on what is drastically different and at least wonder what role those anomalies have in the demise.

    Additionally i belive Prodrive internally was getting awfully big heada nd I've read interviews where their cheif engineer was saying in essence "The cars are far to complex now for mere bumpkin drivers are able to understand anything..I know what is needed so they must just shut up and drive because they don't understand"

    What do you think happened?
    That´s what could happen to big companys as well. Making themselves best in class, just stops developing and the longterm backwards movement starts ending up in disaster for whatever company or brand.
    Understand what I mean?
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  13. Likes: janvanvurpa (26th February 2017)
  14. #129
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,833
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y View Post
    That doesn't explain what happened to the program in 06, though. Plus it's not a terribly large motor to hang ahead of the front axle.
    Every engine hanging complete ahead of front axle is a fundamentally bad idea. Success in motorsport is about being better than others in details because every professional is able to solve major things. When You start with non-solvable handicap You can hardly expect success.

    To Jan's point. Boxer engine always has to have short stroke and large bore because it would be simply too big. Also there are two heads, two sets of cams, long intake and exhaust pipes (with one turbo I guess it's a lot more problematic than with two). The boxer conception itself isn't weight effective at all.
    Last edited by Mirek; 24th February 2017 at 11:59.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  15. Likes: cali (24th February 2017),Rallyper (24th February 2017),TWRC (24th February 2017)
  16. #130
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,092
    Like
    9,921
    Liked 16,095 Times in 6,984 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    You want to insult my intelligence.
    no intelligence,its just plain stupidity.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •