Page 9 of 52 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 520
  1. #81
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Nick, while I have nothing to convince You about 17 cars I'm pretty sure that the peak torque of new WRC cars is a lot bellow 5000 rpm (Your graph), I guess 3500-4000 rpm could be right and the torque is definitely reasonably higher than from R5 car (Fabia has even higher torque than Fiesta). The R5 engines are half-stock units while WRC engines are purpose-built units designed from scratch.

    Also I don't believe that the cars have only 380 Hp. This number apeared when somebody said that the new engines would have 80 Hp more but the key is that 2016 cars never ever had 300 Hp but much more. Again nothing in my hand but I do believe that the true power of 16 cars was something around 340 Hp (2.0 WRC were even stronger, even vintage cars like Octavia or Corolla WRC had real 320-330 Hp). New cars have 19% larger restrictor which might indicate something around 400 Hp.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  2. #82
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    New cars have 19% larger restrictor which might indicate something around 400 Hp.
    Well that's not much of an increase from 380. I believed they can come closer to Group B cars - 450 hp.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,133
    Like
    316
    Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
    You can clearly see on MSport base R5 to R5 Evo comparision chart which Mirek upload that torque difference between 4500rpm and 6000rpm is some 100Nm... so it's not flat...
    Current R5 cars have over 400Nm of torque so 2017 WRC cars with 4mm bigger restrictors, purpose built engines, more advanced technology, etc have much, much more.

  4. #84
    Senior Member NickRally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    264
    Like
    523
    Liked 233 Times in 115 Posts
    Mirek, I agree with your numbers about the new WRC cars, the 380hp will be below what they actually have at their disposal and as you said the previous generation of WRC cars would have had more than 320hp (as stated on the net) in the first place (just for reference for the wider audience 320x1.19~380)

  5. #85
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    8
    Like
    0
    Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
    br21 could put dyno plot from fiesta r5 ?
    I heard you had few r5 on dyno

  6. #86
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    84
    Like
    2
    Liked 52 Times in 28 Posts
    What is rev. limit for 17 cars? Is it defined by rules?

  7. #87
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    I'm not sure but I guess 7500 stays.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  8. #88
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    It's 8500 rpm.

    http://www.fia.com/regulation/category/119

    Technical regulations - Article 255A, page 14.
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  9. Likes: Mirek (2nd February 2017)
  10. #89
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    If they really have rpm limiter at 8500 (I am not sure if they actually use such high rpm at all) it means that the cars actually have shorter gears than 2016 ones - based on the video with speed gun posted in Monte Carlo thread.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  11. #90
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    84
    Like
    2
    Liked 52 Times in 28 Posts
    It seems logical to me... same engine volume, bigger restrictor (more air), so it works optimal at higher revs...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •