Results 81 to 90 of 520
-
1st February 2017, 19:24 #81
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
Nick, while I have nothing to convince You about 17 cars I'm pretty sure that the peak torque of new WRC cars is a lot bellow 5000 rpm (Your graph), I guess 3500-4000 rpm could be right and the torque is definitely reasonably higher than from R5 car (Fabia has even higher torque than Fiesta). The R5 engines are half-stock units while WRC engines are purpose-built units designed from scratch.
Also I don't believe that the cars have only 380 Hp. This number apeared when somebody said that the new engines would have 80 Hp more but the key is that 2016 cars never ever had 300 Hp but much more. Again nothing in my hand but I do believe that the true power of 16 cars was something around 340 Hp (2.0 WRC were even stronger, even vintage cars like Octavia or Corolla WRC had real 320-330 Hp). New cars have 19% larger restrictor which might indicate something around 400 Hp.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
1st February 2017, 19:40 #82
-
1st February 2017, 20:02 #83
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 1,133
- Like
- 316
- Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
You can clearly see on MSport base R5 to R5 Evo comparision chart which Mirek upload that torque difference between 4500rpm and 6000rpm is some 100Nm... so it's not flat...
Current R5 cars have over 400Nm of torque so 2017 WRC cars with 4mm bigger restrictors, purpose built engines, more advanced technology, etc have much, much more.
-
1st February 2017, 20:54 #84
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 264
- Like
- 523
- Liked 233 Times in 115 Posts
Mirek, I agree with your numbers about the new WRC cars, the 380hp will be below what they actually have at their disposal and as you said the previous generation of WRC cars would have had more than 320hp (as stated on the net) in the first place (just for reference for the wider audience 320x1.19~380)
-
1st February 2017, 21:32 #85
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 8
- Like
- 0
- Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
br21 could put dyno plot from fiesta r5 ?
I heard you had few r5 on dyno
-
2nd February 2017, 07:33 #86
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Posts
- 84
- Like
- 2
- Liked 52 Times in 28 Posts
What is rev. limit for 17 cars? Is it defined by rules?
-
2nd February 2017, 12:35 #87
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
I'm not sure but I guess 7500 stays.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
2nd February 2017, 13:50 #88
It's 8500 rpm.
http://www.fia.com/regulation/category/119
Technical regulations - Article 255A, page 14.“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
- Likes: Mirek (2nd February 2017)
-
2nd February 2017, 14:38 #89
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
If they really have rpm limiter at 8500 (I am not sure if they actually use such high rpm at all) it means that the cars actually have shorter gears than 2016 ones - based on the video with speed gun posted in Monte Carlo thread.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
2nd February 2017, 15:26 #90
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Posts
- 84
- Like
- 2
- Liked 52 Times in 28 Posts
It seems logical to me... same engine volume, bigger restrictor (more air), so it works optimal at higher revs...
Meeke had a big gap to Rossel after stage 3 (20 sec) at stage 4 had a puncture and now the gap to Rossel is just 2 sec Gryazin strangely slow,anybody now why?...
Portuguese Rally News