Page 64 of 69 FirstFirst ... 14546263646566 ... LastLast
Results 631 to 640 of 683
  1. #631
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Times changed. That days when gr.B cars had 450 Hp, the common cars used to have 60-80 Hp. Today everybody can buy a car with hundreds of Hp for relatively small money (at least used ones) and nobody is going to be astonished by 400 Hp figure anymore. It was something completely crazy in 1985.
    It's not about the numbers, they aren't something special. But the jump from current power can be a factor in getting used to.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  2. #632
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Is 20% more power so radical change? I don't think so. The cars will be faster mainly in cornering speed thanks to the active center diffs and the aero package but not that much on straights (where some of the power will be spent on the extended aerodynamic drag).
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  3. #633
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    I don't think it is either, but some drivers can find it difficult to adjust. Just an assumption.
    Anyway dangerous crashes can happen with any rally car, no matter ho many hp it has. It is about the safety measures regulations are taken, not the speed/hp.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  4. #634
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    20% as a number is not that radical, but if you take into account that the cars are already very very fast 20% increase is a HUGE number.

    For me the more the better, there is no such thing as too much power in motorsports.

  5. #635
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    I believe the last 2.0T WRC cars had around 370-380 Hp and 800-900 Nm and nobody seemed to think it was too much when there was 300 Hp written everywhere...
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  6. Likes: cali (29th August 2016)
  7. #636
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15
    Like
    0
    Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts

  8. #637
    Senior Member jacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    1,908
    Like
    0
    Liked 111 Times in 48 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    Hilkensteins are unnecessary danger.
    Never expected but i follow N.O.T. here.
    The solution i think is to use car-tires (or something like that) around the Hilkensteins on places were it could be really dangerous like the (fast) place of the crash of Lefebvre. So in this corner you only put them on/at the last four or five ones. You can't make rally a safe heaven but you have to look what it's possible to make it safe were it can, unnatural roadchicanes is also a possibility.

  9. #638
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    188
    Like
    350
    Liked 39 Times in 25 Posts
    maybe we should organize events on a dragster straight with 2k with plenty of barriers... this should be safe enough...

  10. #639
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by marcosg View Post
    maybe we should organize events on a dragster straight with 2k with plenty of barriers... this should be safe enough...
    its not about safety its about unnecessary danger, for example lets say you have a lake on the outside of a corner, that would be fine for rallying since its an acceptable anger, but if that lake was the home of piranhas then that would be an unnecessary danger. Remove the piranhas and keep the lake.

  11. Likes: marcosg (30th August 2016)
  12. #640
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,862
    Like
    140
    Liked 1,093 Times in 491 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    its not about safety its about unnecessary danger, for example lets say you have a lake on the outside of a corner, that would be fine for rallying since its an acceptable anger, but if that lake was the home of piranhas then that would be an unnecessary danger. Remove the piranhas and keep the lake.
    First year you remove the fish, the second year the lake, the third year every solid item close to the road, fourth year you are driving in a parking lot.
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  13. Likes: itix (3rd September 2016),Rally Power (31st August 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •