Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 115
  1. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    164
    Like
    562
    Liked 46 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrJan View Post
    Jesus! People are far more outraged about this than they need to be. It's a balls up, they've acknowledged it was a balls up and we'll now have some shitty little chicanes thrown in to more of the quick stages to keep the speed down. I also can't believe how difficult it is for some people to understand that this is a REQUIREMENT of the insurance.

    Yes it's a pain that bogey times exist, but it's not exactly a new feature of rallying and is sadly a necessary evil (either we have the average speed limits or we have no rally, it's as simple as that). Okay so other countries do it differently, but the British Rally Championship wouldn't be the BRC if it ran in Finland would it?! So for as long as the BRC is run in Britain it will fall under the MSA banner, which means it has the MSA insurance, which means that bogey times will continue to exist.
    Maybe not outraged, but if look at it from the outside it is just ridiculous. I know that rules are rules, but maybe some people need to rethink regulations.

  2. #92
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,897
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,358 Times in 4,972 Posts
    Couple of nice videos showing the modern and historic's in action...

    https://youtu.be/h1-QkJKowh8

    https://youtu.be/vX7Y-B30Ymw
    #M-SPORTER

  3. #93
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,897
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,358 Times in 4,972 Posts
    More chicane's ? Hmmm...

    #M-SPORTER

  4. #94
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Andre Oliveira View Post
    Organizers should avoid that issue. Simple.
    Simple? Do you really think that trying to guess the average speed of a field of top level drivers through say 10 miles of forest track is easy? Perhaps you should offer your expert services to the organising team (many of whom will be volunteers, quite possibly without even covering expenses) for next season.

    Quote Originally Posted by b3637853 View Post
    I know that rules are rules, but maybe some people need to rethink regulations.
    Are you being deliberately obtuse? If insurance wants average speed to be capped then the regulations have to operate within that, they can rethink the Blue Book until the end of days, but it won't change the fact that the MSA won't be able to get insurance cover or it will be prohibitively expensive.
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

  5. #95
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Trying to reason with British autism is a lost war...

  6. #96
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,516
    Like
    544
    Liked 1,064 Times in 465 Posts
    Do the insurance companies want those stupid bogey times (which I heard about for the first time in my life this past weekend)? Is that their 'solution?' Or did the MSA/the organisers/whoever else come up with that idea?

    I think nobody in here is denying the organisers can just ignore the rules, but there are a lot more sensible and effective ways to enforce lower average speeds than by using bogey times.
    SimRace Vereniging Nederland
    www.srvn.nl

  7. #97
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    314
    Like
    1
    Liked 31 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EightGear View Post
    Do the insurance companies want those stupid bogey times (which I heard about for the first time in my life this past weekend)? Is that their 'solution?'
    Yes (or at least when I have asked MSA representatives that is certainly what I have been told.
    Or did the MSA/the organisers/whoever else come up with that idea?
    I know enough organisers to be confident in saying that organisers hate bogey times just as much as competitors (and they also hate chicanes).
    I think nobody in here is denying the organisers can just ignore the rules, but there are a lot more sensible and effective ways to enforce lower average speeds than by using bogey times.
    So please tell us about other solutions (but keep in mind that the Forestry Commission only allow a much more restricted choice of roads these days compared to the past)?
    Tynemouth Computer Services http://www.tynecomp.co.uk

  8. Likes: EightGear (2nd May 2016)
  9. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,516
    Like
    544
    Liked 1,064 Times in 465 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Liddle View Post
    So please tell us about other solutions (but keep in mind that the Forestry Commission only allow a much more restricted choice of roads these days compared to the past)?
    I believe Mirek summed up some better solutions which are used in CZ. Cancelling the second pass.

    But OK, it's not like there would be much milage left in UK rallies these days if a stage gets cancelled.
    SimRace Vereniging Nederland
    www.srvn.nl

  10. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    164
    Like
    562
    Liked 46 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrJan View Post

    Are you being deliberately obtuse? If insurance wants average speed to be capped then the regulations have to operate within that, they can rethink the Blue Book until the end of days, but it won't change the fact that the MSA won't be able to get insurance cover or it will be prohibitively expensive.
    I just stated that people who created the rule about speed limit in rally should get some sense. Obviously organisers have to obey the rules as rally couldn't take place. But just look at this from the outside. What If I told you there is a rally organised somewhere and the drivers can't use 5th gear. Ridiculous isn't it?

  11. #100
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    314
    Like
    1
    Liked 31 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EightGear View Post
    I believe Mirek summed up some better solutions which are used in CZ. Cancelling the second pass.
    It is an interesting solution but it seems to me that it makes a small number of competitors at the front of the field happy but if a stage second run is cancelled then the majority of the competitors who couldn't get close to the bogey are unhappy.
    Tynemouth Computer Services http://www.tynecomp.co.uk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •