Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 215
  1. #91
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    I believe (correction welcome) the first father-son racers in the Indianapolis 500 were Earl Devore (1925-1928) and Billy Devore (1937-1948).

    Billy was also the first driver to race a 6-wheeled car in the Indianapolis 500 (1948).

    Earl was the first and last Indianapolis 500 driver to die being eaten by a shark (1928).
    Last edited by Stan Reid; 16th May 2016 at 02:24.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  2. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  3. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    572
    Like
    1
    Liked 51 Times in 44 Posts
    Interesting. If the criteria were changed to father/son running a major international race, could the Devores be the first? They would be quite a bit earlier than the Ascaris by about 10 years.

  4. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  5. #93
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D28 View Post
    Interesting. If the criteria were changed to father/son running a major international race, could the Devores be the first? They would be quite a bit earlier than the Ascaris by about 10 years.
    I would go with that right now D28. Earl actually won a major event; the 250 mi./400km. AAA Championship race on the 1.25 mi./2 km. board track near Charlotte NC in 1926. I don't see any wins on that level by Billy, born Louis Devore. The younger Devore did enter two World Championship races; the 1950 and 1954 Indianapolis 500s but he failed to qualify on both occasions. Years before 1937, when Billy began driving in the Indianapolis 500, he was a riding mechanic in the event.
    Last edited by Stan Reid; 15th May 2016 at 23:23.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  6. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  7. #94
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    The first and last engine purpose built for the Indianapolis 500 that was later modified to race in Formula 1 was the 1964 Ford 4-cam V-8 Indy engine that was later downsized and raced in the McLaren during the 1966 F1 season.

    Correction welcome
    Last edited by Stan Reid; 15th May 2016 at 14:30.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  8. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  9. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    572
    Like
    1
    Liked 51 Times in 44 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stan Reid View Post
    The first and last engine purpose built for the Indianapolis 500 that was later modified to race in Formula 1 was the 1964 Ford 4-cam V-8 Indy engine that was later downsized and raced in the McLaren during the 1966 F1 season.

    Correction welcome
    And it must be said the conversion was a disaster for F1 racing. the engine and gearbox were too heavy and the hp inadequate. A rare dead end for McLaren, as Bruce spent most of the 66 season trying to get the Ford unit to work. Ironically, he had a lot of experience with the Traco modified Olds engine in sports cars, the same block that Brabham and Repco used to win 2 World Championships. A Ford F1 effort was being pursued independently by Colin Chapman and Cosworth, and evolved into the most successful F1 engine ever. McLaren eventually acquired one of these and things were fine, but first they had to go through the Ford, Serenissima and BRM engines on the way.

  10. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  11. #96
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    Six wheel -three axle cars as best I can tell:

    First 6 wheel/3 axle circuit racing car to compete in a major series=Pat Clancy Special Kurtis Offenhauser in the 1948-1949 AAA Championship=2-4 layout=Driven by Billy Devore, Jackie Holmes and Mack Hellings=Best finish - 4th in the 1949 Milwaukee 100 by Jackie Holmes

    Last 6 wheel/3 axle circuit racing car to compete in a major series=Tyrrell P34 Cosworth in the 1976-1977 Formula 1 World Championship=4-2 layout=Driven by Jody Scheckter, Patrick Depailler and Ronnie Peterson=Best finish - 1st in the 1976 Swedish Grand Prix by Jody Scheckter
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  12. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  13. #97
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D28 View Post
    I didn't realize that 1959 was such a banner year for Ward. He won at Indy, the Lime rock F Libre race and appeared at the USGP all in the same year. Such a shame he didn't have access to a proper Cooper or something similar for Sebring, he would have acquitted himself well. His only other F1 outing wasn't till 1963 at Watkins Glen in a Lotus-BRM. By then he was 42 and the car wasn't that competitive, he qualified 17th and was a DNF.
    I actually saw Ward race in the 1959 Springfield 100 but his luck ran out that day. Four laps into the race, he burned a piston (probably too much nitro) and "finished" in last place.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  14. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  15. #98
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D28 View Post
    And it must be said the conversion was a disaster for F1 racing. the engine and gearbox were too heavy and the hp inadequate. A rare dead end for McLaren, as Bruce spent most of the 66 season trying to get the Ford unit to work. Ironically, he had a lot of experience with the Traco modified Olds engine in sports cars, the same block that Brabham and Repco used to win 2 World Championships. A Ford F1 effort was being pursued independently by Colin Chapman and Cosworth, and evolved into the most successful F1 engine ever. McLaren eventually acquired one of these and things were fine, but first they had to go through the Ford, Serenissima and BRM engines on the way.
    Yes, the McLaren-Ford could do no better than a 5th place in the U.S. Grand Prix.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  16. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  17. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    572
    Like
    1
    Liked 51 Times in 44 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stan Reid View Post
    Yes, the McLaren-Ford could do no better than a 5th place in the U.S. Grand Prix.
    I had forgotten that result. Still a quick comparison with the Cosworth engine in F1 would read:
    Ford Indy Engine 2 points Ford-Cosworth Engine 4336 points.

    Of course the Indy engine was very good at what it was designed for, which was not F1.
    Last edited by D28; 25th May 2016 at 15:07.

  18. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)
  19. #100
    Senior Member Stan Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
    Posts
    414
    Like
    36
    Liked 156 Times in 153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D28 View Post
    Harry Schell wangled an entry for the Monaco GP, but set no practice time. His Cooper-Jap starting from the back thus was the first Cooper to start a F1 WC race, as well as the first rear engined entry, even though the car was definitely not a F1 car. All for naught as he failed to complete a lap being involved in a 9 car pile up on lap 1. Because he had no practice time, it is difficult to assess his lap times, but he would have been quite a bit off the pace.
    Although it was the first rear engine to race, I believe the first rear engined car to enter and practice for a World Championship Race (the 1950 Indianapolis 500) was the Rounds Rocket, a Lesovsky-Diedt Offenhauser. Indy practice began on May 1 of 1950 (almost 3 weeks before Monaco FP1) and the car was driven by both Sam Hanks and Bill Vukovich. Neither of the two future winners could get the car up to qualifying speed. The Rounds Rocket was a 4.5 liter normally aspirated racer so it was fully Formula 1 legal. I believe Al Miller also practiced one of the old Gulf-Millers in early May and it failed to qualify as well.

    RoundsRocket.jpg Click to enlarge
    Rounds Rocket

    A beautiful machine ahead of its time, I'd say.
    Last edited by Stan Reid; 26th May 2016 at 22:20.
    This is my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking

  20. Likes: Fortitude (9th January 2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •